Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

04:52
Hand-Rearing Method for Infant Marmosets
Published on: June 9, 2023
Partner effects on food consumption in brown capuchin monkeys
Marietta Dindo1, Frans B M De Waal
1Living Links, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. md285@st-andrews.ac.uk
American Journal of Primatology
|December 6, 2006
Summary
Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) did not show inequity aversion when offered food without a task. Instead, they engaged in scramble competition when a conspecific was present and food-deprived.
Area of Science:
- Primate behavior
- Comparative psychology
- Animal cognition
Background:
- Previous studies suggested capuchin monkeys exhibit inequity aversion in food-reward tasks.
- However, social and contextual factors might influence food consumption in conspecific presence.
- The role of inequity aversion in non-task-based food distribution remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate inequity aversion in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) without a task-based reward system.
- To determine if food value and partner's access influence food collection and consumption rates.
- To compare findings with previous research on inequity aversion in primates.
Main Methods:
- Pairs of capuchin monkeys were presented with unequally valued food items (cucumber vs. grape).
- Four conditions were tested: equity, inequity, inaccessible equity, and inaccessible inequity.
- Food collection and consumption rates of low-valued items were measured.
Main Results:
- Monkeys did not display negative reactions to inequitable food distribution.
- Scramble competition (rapid food collection) occurred when a conspecific was present without food access.
- Consumption of low-value food was facilitated when a conspecific consumed high-value food.
Conclusions:
- Capuchin monkeys may not exhibit inequity aversion when food is freely available, unlike in task-reward scenarios.
- Social dynamics, such as scramble competition and facilitation, appear to override inequity concerns in this context.
- The function of inequity aversion might be context-dependent, differing between task rewards and freely available resources.
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Foraging
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
Regulation of Food Intake
Short-term regulation of food intake primarily involves neural signals from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, blood nutrient levels, and GI tract hormones. Communication between the gut and brain via vagal nerve fibers plays a significant role in evaluating the contents of the gut. Clinical studies have shown that protein ingestion produces a more prolonged response in these nerve fibers compared to an equivalent amount of glucose. Additionally, the activation of stretch receptors caused by GI...
Predator-Prey Interactions
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.Although predation is commonly associated with carnivory, for...
Conditioned Taste Aversion
Conditioned taste aversion, also known as sauce béarnaise syndrome, is a phenomenon in which an individual develops an aversion to a certain food taste following a negative experience, typically illness. This form of aversion is a type of classical conditioning in which the taste of the food (conditioned stimulus, CS) is associated with the experience of illness (unconditioned stimulus, UCS).
A notable characteristic of conditioned taste aversion is that it often requires only a single exposure...
A notable characteristic of conditioned taste aversion is that it often requires only a single exposure...
Microbial Interactions: Predation
Microbial predation refers to the process by which one microorganism kills and consumes another to obtain nutrients and energy. It encompasses both bacterial and protozoan predators. This interaction plays a crucial role in shaping microbial communities and regulating nutrient cycling.Bacterial Predators: Epibiotic vs. EndobioticBacterial predators are classified based on their mode of attack as either epibiotic or endobiotic. Epibiotic predators, such as Vampirococcus, attach to the surface of...
Symbiosis
Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...

