Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Taste Preference Assay for Adult Drosophila
Published on: September 8, 2016
[Features of differential inhibition in choice between alimentary and defensive response]
Abstract:
Instrumental defensive (avoidance/escape) and alimentary responses (reinforced with palatable food) in dogs were conditioned by the same stimulus (6-Hz light flashes). Differential inhibition for these responses (0.6-Hz flashes) was formed in unalterable series. Later on, alternative experiments with choice between reinforcements were carried out. In both of experimental series, the degree of alimentary excitability (hunger, satiation) was changed. Numbers of responses to differential and positive conditioned stimuli and their latencies were calculated. Under condition of choice (electrodes on a leg and a pedal in front of a dog) the response depended on a dominant motivation. The dogs differed in the degree of motivation dominance. Differential inhibition was less perfect in unalterable experimental series with dominant motivation. Under conditions of choice between alimentary and defensive reinforcements, the response to the differential stimuli depended on the balance between these motivations: two days of hunger increased the number of alimentary responses, defensive responses prevailed after satiation.
Related Concept Videos
Neural Regulation
Types of Selection
Predator-Prey Interactions
Defenses Against Pathogens and Herbivores
The Physiology of Taste
Instinctive Drift

