Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Euthanasia and the doctrine of double effect].

Martin Klein1

  • 1dr.martinklein@t-online.de

Wurzburger Medizinhistorische Mitteilungen
|December 13, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reduced cortical gyrification in type 1 diabetes is associated with white matter integrity loss and cognitive decline.

Metabolic brain disease·2026
Same author

Hypereosinophilia With Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in Patients With Asthma on Anti-Inteleurkin-5 Biologics.

Chest·2026
Same author

Alterations in systemic and skeletal muscle myostatin regulation are most prominent at disease onset and associate with muscle-related outcomes in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

Arthritis research & therapy·2026
Same author

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy-novel insights in long-term outcomes and pathophysiology leading to international guideline modification and new emerging therapies.

Journal of nephrology·2026
Same author

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related acute kidney injury: A diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for nephrologists.

World journal of nephrology·2026
Same author

Food and Drug Administration regulation of biosimilar products: Improving affordability of biologics for patients with asthma and allergic diseases.

The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology·2026

Voluntary active euthanasia is often debated, but ethical distinctions between active, passive, and indirect euthanasia are questionable. Respecting individual autonomy, not action vs. inaction, should guide end-of-life decisions.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Medical Ethics
  • Philosophy of Medicine

Context:

  • Most countries prohibit direct active euthanasia, permitting passive and indirect forms.
  • Arguments against voluntary active euthanasia legalization often contain logical flaws.
  • Ethical distinctions between active, passive, and indirect euthanasia are increasingly challenged.

Purpose:

  • To critically analyze the ethical arguments surrounding euthanasia, particularly voluntary active euthanasia.
  • To examine the validity of the principle of double effect in justifying indirect euthanasia.
  • To argue for the ethical equivalence of direct active and indirect euthanasia based on patient autonomy.

Summary:

  • Ethical differences between active, passive, and indirect euthanasia are difficult to sustain, especially when inaction leads to death.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The principle of double effect, commonly used to justify indirect euthanasia, contains a logical fallacy.
  • Terminal sedation illustrates how indirect euthanasia may involve avoidable harm, rendering the principle of double effect inapplicable.
  • Direct active and indirect euthanasia cannot be ethically distinguished using the principle of double effect.

    • Impact:

    • Challenges the ethical basis for prohibiting voluntary active euthanasia.
    • Highlights the primacy of individual autonomy in end-of-life care discussions.
    • Suggests a re-evaluation of euthanasia laws and ethical frameworks.
    • Provides a philosophical basis for reconsidering the legality and ethical permissibility of active euthanasia.