Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

09:46
MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions
Published on: May 10, 2012
Stimulus-response compatibility with pure and mixed mappings in a flight task environment
Motonori Yamaguchi1, Robert W Proctor
1Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2081, USA. myamaguc@psych.purdue.edu
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied
|December 13, 2006
Summary
The stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) effect in flight simulation depends on the response type. Yoke turns showed an SRC effect, but button presses did not, impacting aviation cockpit design.
Area of Science:
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Cognitive Psychology
- Aviation Psychology
Background:
- The stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) effect influences performance in human-machine interfaces.
- Understanding SRC is crucial for designing effective aviation cockpits.
- Previous research has explored SRC in various contexts, but less in complex simulated flight environments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) effect in a simulated flight environment.
- To determine how different display formats (inside-out, outside-in) and response types (yoke turns, button presses) affect SRC.
- To analyze sequential effects influencing SRC in flight tasks.
Main Methods:
- Four experiments were conducted using simulated flight tasks.
- Experiments 1 and 2 utilized pure and mixed mappings with inside-out and outside-in attitude displays.
- Experiments 3 and 4 employed a simplified display and task, differentiating between yoke turns and button presses as responses.
Main Results:
- The SRC effect was observed with mixed mappings when responses involved flight yoke turns (Experiments 1-3).
- Conversely, the SRC effect was absent with mixed mappings when responses were button presses (Experiment 4).
- Sequential effect analyses indicated that reduced SRC in Experiments 1-3 was partly due to repeated congruent trials, but this did not explain the elimination in Experiment 4.
Conclusions:
- The type of response significantly modulates the SRC effect in simulated flight.
- Button press responses may eliminate the SRC effect, unlike yoke turns, suggesting different cognitive processing.
- Findings have direct implications for optimizing aviation cockpit design and interface usability.

