Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Generalized additive modeling with implicit variable selection by likelihood-based boosting.

Gerhard Tutz1, Harald Binder

  • 1Institut für Statistik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Akademiestr. 1, D-80799 München, Germany. tutz@stat.uni-muenchen.de

Biometrics
|December 13, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Systematic Evaluation of Plasma and Urine Metabolites to Predict the Risk of Adverse Kidney-related Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease: The GCKD Study∗.

Kidney medicine·2026
Same author

Ensuring Quality in Preclinical Research: The Importance of Being Human.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same author

TACR3 variant confers resilience to aging and Alzheimer's disease.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Structured hierarchical regression for Likert scales including dispersion effects: Models and fitting tools.

Psychological methods·2026
Same author

mmContext: an open framework for multimodal contrastive learning of omics and text data.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Resting-state brain activity and association with physical activity.

Frontiers in aging neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

A Bayesian phase I/II platform design with data augmentation accounting for delayed outcomes.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Generalized additive model boosting addresses limitations in traditional statistical analysis by enabling the selection of numerous variables and smoothing parameters. This advanced technique offers a robust solution for complex data analysis challenges.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Machine Learning
  • Data Analysis

Background:

  • Generalized additive models (GAMs) face limitations with numerous explanatory variables and smoothing parameter selection.
  • These challenges hinder the effective application of GAMs in complex statistical data analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate a generalized additive model boosting procedure.
  • To overcome the inherent restrictions of traditional GAMs regarding variable selection and smoothing parameter determination.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a stagewise fitting procedure for weak learners applicable to exponential family distributions (binomial, Poisson, normal).
  • Integrated variable selection and smoothing parameter determination within a single procedure.
  • Utilized penalized regression splines and penalized stumps as weak learners.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed an approximate hat matrix for standard deviation estimates and stopping criteria.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed method effectively handles multiple explanatory variables and determines appropriate smoothing.
    • It demonstrated strong performance compared to common GAM fitting procedures.
    • The method excelled in high-dimensional settings with numerous nuisance variables.

    Conclusions:

    • Generalized additive model boosting provides a powerful and flexible alternative to traditional GAMs.
    • This approach is particularly advantageous for high-dimensional data analysis.
    • The procedure offers a unified solution for variable selection and smoothing parameter optimization.