Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dates from the molecular clock: how wrong can we be?

Mário J F Pulquério1, Richard A Nichols

  • 1School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK. m.pulquerio@qmul.ac.uk

Trends in Ecology & Evolution
|December 13, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Combined phylogenetic and geographic data can predict plant-pest interactions with high accuracy.

The New phytologist·2026
Same author

Rapid polygenic adaptation in a wild population of ash trees under a novel fungal epidemic.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Quantitative measurement of phenotype dynamics during cancer drug resistance evolution using genetic barcoding.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Can genomic analysis actually estimate past population size?

Trends in genetics : TIG·2025
Same author

Maintenance and expansion of genetic and trait variation following domestication in a clonal crop.

Molecular ecology·2023
Same author

Assembly-free quantification of vagrant DNA inserts.

Molecular ecology resources·2023
Same journal

The host-microbiome dimension of ecological regime shifts.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same journal

The emerging field of wild animal welfare science.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same journal

Integrating nutritional mutualists into the evolution of defense.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same journal

Formation of three great Asian plateaus, climate change, and biodiversity: (Trends Ecol. Evol. 40, 970-982; 2025).

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same journal

Digital twins as a tool for ecosystem research.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same journal

Constraint and convergence in the evolution of vertebrate sound production.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
See all related articles

Discrepancies in evolutionary event dating using the molecular clock persist. New software aims to improve accuracy, but its effectiveness requires further validation and research into dating uncertainties.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Molecular Evolution
  • Paleontology

Background:

  • The molecular clock method is widely used to estimate evolutionary event dates.
  • Significant discrepancies exist between molecular clock estimates and fossil record data.
  • Discrepancies also arise between different molecular dating methods, sometimes differing by 20-fold.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce new software designed to account for uncertainties in molecular clock dating.
  • To assess the progress and limitations of current methods in obtaining reliable evolutionary dates.
  • To highlight the need for further research into the causes of discrepancies in molecular clock estimates.

Main Methods:

  • Development and application of new software for molecular clock analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of dates derived from molecular data with those from the fossil record.
  • Analysis of discrepancies arising from different molecular dating techniques.
  • Main Results:

    • New software has been developed to incorporate allowances for uncertainty in date estimates.
    • The software represents a potential advancement in molecular clock dating accuracy.
    • The effectiveness and reliability of the new methods remain unproven and require further investigation.

    Conclusions:

    • Recent innovations offer progress towards reliable molecular clock dating.
    • The causes and patterns of discrepancies in molecular clock estimates are still under active research.
    • Previous studies may have overestimated the confidence in their date estimates, necessitating potential revisions.