Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Proteasome01:13

The Proteasome

Eukaryotic cells can degrade proteins through several pathways. One of the most important among these is the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. It helps the cell eliminate the misfolded, damaged, or unwarranted cytoplasmic proteins in a highly specific manner.
In this pathway, the target proteins are first tagged with small proteins called ubiquitin. This involves participation of a series of enzymes including— E1 (ubiquitin-activating enzyme), E2 (ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme), and E3 (ubiquitin...
The Proteasome02:18

The Proteasome

Eukaryotic cells can degrade proteins through several pathways. One of the most important amongst these is the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. It helps the cell eliminate the misfolded, damaged, or unwarranted cytoplasmic proteins in a highly specific manner.
In this pathway, the target proteins are first tagged with small proteins called ubiquitin. A series of enzymes carry out the ubiquitination of the target proteins - E1 (ubiquitin-activating enzyme), E2 (ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme), and E3...
The Proteasome02:18

The Proteasome

Eukaryotic cells can degrade proteins through several pathways. One of the most important amongst these is the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. It helps the cell eliminate the misfolded, damaged, or unwarranted cytoplasmic proteins in a highly specific manner.
In this pathway, the target proteins are first tagged with small proteins called ubiquitin. A series of enzymes carry out the ubiquitination of the target proteins - E1 (ubiquitin-activating enzyme), E2 (ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme), and E3...
Regulated Protein Degradation02:58

Regulated Protein Degradation

It is vital to regulate the activity of enzymatic as well as non-enzymatic proteins inside the cell. This can be achieved either through creating a balance between their rate of synthesis and degradation or regulating the intrinsic activity of the protein. Both these regulation mechanisms play an essential role in the normal functioning of cells.
Protein degradation plays two important roles in the cells. It helps to protect cells from misfolded or damaged proteins before they lead to a...
Regulated Protein Degradation02:58

Regulated Protein Degradation

It is vital to regulate the activity of enzymatic as well as non-enzymatic proteins inside the cell. This can be achieved either through creating a balance between their rate of synthesis and degradation or regulating the intrinsic activity of the protein. Both these regulation mechanisms play an essential role in the normal functioning of cells.
Protein degradation plays two important roles in the cells. It helps to protect cells from misfolded or damaged proteins before they lead to a...
The Proteasome Structure01:17

The Proteasome Structure

The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is a well-known mechanism utilized by eukaryotic cells to remove cytoplasmic proteins that are misfolded, damaged, or no longer needed. In this pathway, the protein that needs to be eliminated undergoes a process called ubiquitination, where a chain of ubiquitin molecules is attached to the 48th lysine residue of the target protein. This ubiquitin modification helps the proteasome distinguish between a target protein and a healthy protein.
The proteasome is an...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Discovery and Optimization of a Trichloroacetamidine Scaffold as a Novel Antibacterial against Multidrug-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>.

ACS medicinal chemistry letters·2026
Same author

From Gut to Systemic Circulation: Molecular Strategies of Botulinum Neurotoxin Complexes.

Toxins·2026
Same author

Screening of gene function in cell intoxication by CNF1 links Sec61 translocon to Rac1 GTPase activity.

mBio·2025
Same author

Amesilide, a New Bicyclic Polyketide from the Marine Fungus <i>Amesia nigricolor</i> MUT6601.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

[Caveolin-1 stiffens the plasma membrane and limits transcellular tunnel expansion].

Medecine sciences : M/S·2025
Same author

Evolutionary conserved regulation of TFEB stability by the E3 ubiquitin ligase WWP2 modulates response to stress <i>in vivo</i>.

iScience·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 18, 2026

In-vitro Reconstitution of Bacterial Ubiquitination and VCP/p97-mediated Elimination
07:58

In-vitro Reconstitution of Bacterial Ubiquitination and VCP/p97-mediated Elimination

Published on: January 2, 2026

Bacteria and the ubiquitin pathway.

Patrick Munro1, Gilles Flatau, Emmanuel Lemichez

  • 1Inserm, U627, Faculté de Médecine, 28 Avenue de Valombrose, 06107, Nice, Cedex 2, France.

Current Opinion in Microbiology
|December 13, 2006
PubMed
Summary

This study explores how bacteria use ubiquitin signaling to manipulate host cells during infection. Ubiquitylation is a process that regulates protein function and stability. Bacteria may interfere with this process to control immune responses and cell survival. The research highlights how bacterial effectors alter ubiquitin pathways to influence virulence factors and promote internalization into host cells. These interactions may determine whether bacteria establish persistent or harmful relationships with their hosts. The findings suggest that understanding these mechanisms could provide insights into how bacteria manipulate host signaling to their advantage.

Keywords:
Ubiquitin signalingBacterial effectorsHost-pathogen interactionsImmune signaling

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Assaying Proteasomal Degradation in a Cell-free System in Plants
07:43

Assaying Proteasomal Degradation in a Cell-free System in Plants

Published on: March 26, 2014

In Vitro Ubiquitination and Deubiquitination Assays of Nucleosomal Histones
11:36

In Vitro Ubiquitination and Deubiquitination Assays of Nucleosomal Histones

Published on: July 25, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 18, 2026

In-vitro Reconstitution of Bacterial Ubiquitination and VCP/p97-mediated Elimination
07:58

In-vitro Reconstitution of Bacterial Ubiquitination and VCP/p97-mediated Elimination

Published on: January 2, 2026

Assaying Proteasomal Degradation in a Cell-free System in Plants
07:43

Assaying Proteasomal Degradation in a Cell-free System in Plants

Published on: March 26, 2014

In Vitro Ubiquitination and Deubiquitination Assays of Nucleosomal Histones
11:36

In Vitro Ubiquitination and Deubiquitination Assays of Nucleosomal Histones

Published on: July 25, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Molecular microbiology
  • Cellular signaling pathways
  • Host-pathogen interactions

Background:

Ubiquitylation is a dynamic process that alters protein function and stability. This modification is crucial for regulating immune responses and cell survival. However, the role of ubiquitin signaling in bacterial infections is not fully understood. Prior research has shown that ubiquitin pathways are involved in immune signaling and apoptosis. But how bacteria manipulate these pathways remains unclear. This gap motivated further investigation into bacterial strategies. No prior work had resolved the specific mechanisms bacteria use to interfere with ubiquitin signaling. Understanding these interactions could reveal new insights into host-pathogen dynamics. This uncertainty drives the need to explore how bacterial effectors modulate ubiquitin pathways.

Purpose Of The Study:

The study aimed to examine how bacterial effectors influence ubiquitin signaling during infection. Researchers focused on the mechanisms bacteria use to manipulate host ubiquitylation. The motivation was to uncover how these interactions affect immune and anti-apoptotic responses. The goal was to identify bacterial strategies that alter ubiquitin pathways. This approach could shed light on how bacteria establish persistent or harmful relationships with hosts. The problem addressed is the lack of clarity on bacterial modulation of ubiquitin signaling. By analyzing bacterial effectors, the study sought to clarify their role in host cell regulation. This work could contribute to understanding the molecular basis of infection outcomes.

Main Methods:

The researchers reviewed recent studies on bacterial effectors and ubiquitin signaling. They analyzed how these effectors interfere with ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like modifications. The approach involved synthesizing evidence from multiple experimental models. The focus was on spatial and temporal regulation of virulence factors. The study examined how bacteria manipulate ubiquitin-binding proteins. The methods included comparative analysis of bacterial strategies across different species. Researchers highlighted examples of effectors targeting ubiquitin pathways. The synthesis emphasized the functional implications of these interactions.

Main Results:

Bacterial effectors were found to modulate ubiquitin signaling in host cells. These effectors influence immune and anti-apoptotic signaling cascades. Some bacteria corrupt ubiquitylation machinery to control virulence factors. Others use ubiquitin modifications to trigger internalization into host cells. The study identified several new examples of bacterial targeting of ubiquitin pathways. These findings suggest that ubiquitin signaling is a key target for bacterial manipulation. The results emphasize the importance of ubiquitin regulation in host-pathogen interactions. The evidence supports the idea that bacteria exploit ubiquitin signaling to alter host responses.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that bacterial effectors manipulate ubiquitin signaling to regulate host responses. These interactions may influence the outcome of infections. The findings suggest that ubiquitin pathways are a critical target for bacterial manipulation. The study highlights the diversity of bacterial strategies in altering ubiquitin signaling. The authors suggest that these interactions may determine whether bacteria establish persistent or harmful relationships. The conclusions emphasize the need for further research on bacterial effectors and ubiquitin signaling. The study underscores the importance of understanding how bacteria modulate host pathways. The results may inform future investigations into host-pathogen interactions.

Bacterial effectors modulate ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like modifications to regulate immune and anti-apoptotic signaling. These effectors may corrupt ubiquitylation machinery to control virulence factors.

Ubiquitylation regulates protein function and stability, influencing immune responses and apoptosis. Bacteria may exploit these pathways to alter host cell behavior.

Bacteria use spatial and temporal control of virulence factors to optimize their survival and spread within host cells.

Ubiquitin-binding proteins are key regulators of protein function. Bacteria may interfere with these proteins to disrupt host signaling pathways.

Some bacteria manipulate ubiquitin modifications to promote their uptake into host cells, facilitating infection.

The findings suggest that ubiquitin signaling is a critical target for bacterial manipulation, influencing infection outcomes.