Practices and pitfalls of mouse cancer models in drug discovery

Andrew L Kung1

  • 1Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

Advances in Cancer Research
|December 13, 2006
PubMed

Insights

Mouse cancer models are vital for studying cancer development and therapies. Careful selection of these models and study endpoints can improve prediction of human therapeutic efficacy, reducing drug development costs.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Translational Research
  • Preclinical Models

Background:

  • Mouse cancer models are essential for understanding cancer biology and evaluating new treatments.
  • Concerns exist regarding the predictive accuracy of mouse models for human cancer therapy outcomes.
  • Transplanted tumor models are widely used in preclinical cancer research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review commonly used transplanted mouse tumor models (subcutaneous and orthotopic).
  • To discuss in vivo study endpoints utilized in cancer research.
  • To highlight the impact of model and endpoint selection on predictive value.

Main Methods:

  • Review of established transplanted tumor models in mice.
  • Analysis of common in vivo study endpoints for cancer therapy assessment.
  • Discussion of factors influencing the predictive value of preclinical models.

Main Results:

  • Commonly used models include subcutaneous and orthotopic transplanted tumors.
  • Various in vivo study endpoints are frequently employed.
  • Model and endpoint selection significantly influences predictive accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • Optimizing the selection of mouse cancer models and study endpoints is crucial.
  • Improved predictive value can enhance research productivity and lower drug development expenses.
  • Careful consideration of preclinical models is key for successful cancer drug development.