Continent cutaneous urinary diversion in children: experience with Charleston pouch I

N K Bissada1, M M Abdallah, I Aaronson

  • 1Arkansas Children's Hospital and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.

The Journal of Urology
|December 13, 2006
PubMed

Insights

The Charleston pouch I continent urinary diversion is a satisfactory option for children, offering good continence and upper urinary tract preservation. Patient and family acceptance were favorable, with acceptable complication rates.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Urology
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Urinary Diversion Techniques

Background:

  • Complete continent urinary diversion excluding the bladder is infrequently performed in pediatric cases.
  • The Charleston pouch I is a specific type of continent cutaneous urinary diversion.
  • Evaluating outcomes is crucial for establishing its utility in children.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the short-term and long-term outcomes of the Charleston pouch I continent cutaneous urinary diversion in pediatric patients.
  • To determine the efficacy, safety, and patient acceptance of this diversion method.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective review of 17 children who underwent Charleston pouch I diversion between 1988 and 2005.
  • Data collected included patient demographics, indications, pre- and post-operative parameters, continence, complications, and long-term functional status.
  • Mean follow-up was 87.5 months.

Main Results:

  • Indications included bladder exstrophy (47%), neurogenic bladder (35%), and cloacal abnormalities (18%).
  • Most patients achieved dryness with catheterization every 2-6 hours; leakage occurred with missed catheterizations.
  • No upper urinary tract deterioration or clinical pyelonephritis/acidosis was observed; 18% developed bladder stones. Patient and family acceptance was satisfactory.

Conclusions:

  • Charleston pouch I continent urinary diversion is a satisfactory procedure in children.
  • It effectively preserves the upper urinary tract and achieves acceptable continence.
  • Good patient/parent acceptance and acceptable complication rates support its use.
Abstract