Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Implant-specific patient identification cards.

Edward W Lambert1

  • 1Division of Joint Reconstructive Surgery, Bone and Joint Sports Medicine Institute, Naval Medical Center, Portsmouth, Virginia 23708, USA.

The Journal of Arthroplasty
|December 13, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The effect of intra-articular methadone on postoperative pain following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2005
Same author

Distribution and care of shipboard blast injuries (USS Cole DDG-67).

The Journal of trauma·2003
Same author

Ankle arthroscopy in the lateral decubitus position.

Foot & ankle international·2003
Same author

Orthopaedic injuries among survivors of USS COLE attack.

Journal of orthopaedic trauma·2003
Same journal

Preoperative Pneumonia and Its Association With Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Postoperative Complications After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same journal

Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty Following Prior Internal Fixation: A Comparison with Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same journal

The Relationship Between Patient Satisfaction and the Degree of Valgus Deformity in Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at a Mean 3-Year Follow-Up.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same journal

Kneeling After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does Resurfacing the Patella Affect the Ability to Kneel?

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same journal

Integrating Robotic-Assisted Arthroplasty into Orthopaedic Education: The Fellows' Perspective.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same journal

A Systematic Review of Registry and Large Database Studies Comparing Contemporary Cementless and Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
See all related articles

Revision arthroplasty planning requires knowing current implant components. Providing patients with an implant-specific identification card at surgery simplifies this crucial preoperative information gathering.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medical Device Tracking

Background:

  • Preoperative planning for revision arthroplasty is critical for successful outcomes.
  • Identifying existing implant components is a key challenge in revision surgery.
  • Previous operative reports are often unavailable or lack detailed component information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a standardized method for tracking orthopedic implant components.
  • To improve the efficiency and accuracy of preoperative planning for revision arthroplasty.
  • To enhance patient safety by ensuring critical implant data is readily accessible.

Main Methods:

  • Implementing an implant-specific patient identification card system at the time of index arthroplasty surgery.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Documenting all implant components, including manufacturer, model, and serial number, on the patient card.
  • Utilizing the patient identification card as a primary data source for preoperative planning.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed identification card system provides immediate access to essential implant information.
    • This method mitigates the common problem of missing or incomplete operative reports.
    • Facilitates more informed and efficient surgical planning for revision procedures.

    Conclusions:

    • An implant-specific patient identification card is a practical solution for tracking components.
    • This system significantly improves preoperative planning for revision arthroplasty.
    • Universal adoption of such cards can enhance patient care and surgical outcomes.