Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Point-of-care CRISPR-based Diagnostics with Premixed and Freeze-dried Reagents
Published on: August 16, 2024
Point-of-care C-reactive protein testing in febrile children in general practice
Miriam Monteny1, Marjolein H ten Brinke, Jocelyn van Brakel
1Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Insights
Point-of-care C-reactive protein (CRP) testing aids in distinguishing infections. The Nycocard CRP test showed good correlation with lab results in febrile children, making it suitable for general practice.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Point-of-Care Diagnostics
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Point-of-care testing for C-reactive protein (CRP) can aid in differentiating viral from bacterial infections.
- Accurate point-of-care CRP devices are needed for comparison with laboratory testing.
- Evaluation of point-of-care CRP tests in general practice settings is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate two point-of-care CRP tests, Nycocard and QuikRead.
- To compare their performance against a reference immunoturbidimetric assay.
- To assess their utility in febrile children in a general practice setting.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study of febrile children (3 months to 6 years) was conducted.
- Blood samples were collected within 24 hours of presentation to an out-of-hours general practice service.
- Nycocard tests were performed at home; QuikRead and reference tests were done in the laboratory.
Main Results:
- Fifty-nine children had all three CRP tests performed.
- The Nycocard test showed a mean difference of 0.6 mg/L compared to the reference test.
- The QuikRead test underestimated CRP concentrations above 60 mg/L, with a mean difference of -6.1 mg/L.
Conclusions:
- The Nycocard CRP test demonstrated good correlation with the reference assay up to 160 mg/L.
- The QuikRead test showed underestimation of CRP levels above 60 mg/L.
- The Nycocard test is a viable option for point-of-care CRP testing in general practice.
Background:
Point-of-care testing for C-reactive protein (CRP) may be helpful in differentiating viral from bacterial infection. Such a device should give results comparable to laboratory testing. The aim was to evaluate two point-of-care CRP tests (Nycocard and QuikRead) in febrile children in general practice, compared to a reference immunoturbidimetric assay.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study was carried out of febrile children aged 3 months to 6 years presented to a general practice out-of-hours service. Children were visited at home where blood was taken for tests, within 24 h after presentation. The Nycocard test was performed at home, whereas the QuikRead and reference test were performed in the laboratory.
Results:
A total of 76 children were enrolled. All three CRP tests were performed in 59 children. The mean difference between the reference test and Nycocard and QuikRead was 0.6 and -6.1 mg/L, respectively. The slope of the Passing-Bablok regression was 0.95 (95% CI 0.9-1.0) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.81-0.85) for the Nycocard and QuikRead tests, respectively.
Conclusions:
Up to a concentration of 160 mg/L, the Nycocard test correlated well with the reference test, while the QuikRead test underestimated concentrations above 60 mg/L. The Nycocard test seems a good candidate for CRP point-of-care testing in general practice.
Related Concept Videos
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Pericarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Real Time RT-PCR
The real-time quantification of the number of amplified products is...
Methods of reducing fever
Pharmacological Methods of Reducing Fever: