AlphaIIbbeta3 priming and clustering by orally active and intravenous integrin antagonists

R R Hantgan1, M C Stahle, J H Connor

  • 1Department of Biochemistry, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1019, USA. hantgan@wfubmc.edu

Insights

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, while blocking platelet interactions, can paradoxically increase thrombosis risk by leaving the alpha(IIb)beta(3) receptor in an activated state. Understanding these mechanisms is key to improving safety and efficacy.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Research
  • Pharmacology
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GP IIb/IIIa) receptor antagonists are crucial in percutaneous coronary interventions.
  • These drugs block platelet aggregation but can paradoxically increase thrombosis risk.
  • Understanding GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor mechanisms is vital for patient safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test if blocking fibrinogen binding activates the alpha(IIb)beta(3) receptor.
  • To compare the effects of oral (orbofiban, roxifiban) and IV (eptifibatide, tirofiban) agents, plus echistatin, on platelet function and receptor conformation.

Main Methods:

  • Flow cytometry, aggregometry, and adhesion assays determined antagonist concentrations for platelet saturation and interaction blocking.
  • Analytical ultracentrifugation assessed effects on alpha(IIb)beta(3) solution structure.
  • Fluorescence anisotropy provided equilibrium and kinetic data for integrin:antagonist interactions.

Main Results:

  • Oral drugs (orbofiban, roxifiban) bound tighter and inhibited aggregation/adhesion more than echistatin.
  • The order of perturbing alpha(IIb)beta(3) conformation and promoting clustering was: echistatin > eptifibatide > orbofiban > tirofiban > roxifiban.
  • Roxifiban most effectively disrupted the alpha(IIb)beta(3):echistatin complex.

Conclusions:

  • GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors' tight binding and fibrinogen blocking ability also perturb resting integrin conformation.
  • This conformational change limits the safety and efficacy of both oral and IV integrin antagonists.
  • Further research into these mechanisms can optimize antiplatelet therapies.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Intracellular Signaling Affects Focal Adhesions01:17

Intracellular Signaling Affects Focal Adhesions

Integrins act both as extracellular input receivers and as intracellular processing activators. As their name suggests, integrins are entirely integrated into the membrane structure. Their hydrophobic membrane-spanning regions interact with the phospholipid bilayer's hydrophobic region. These membrane receptors provide extracellular attachment sites for effectors like hormones and growth factors. They activate intracellular response cascades when their effectors are bound and active.
Some...
Integrins01:10

Integrins

Animal and protozoan cells do not have cell walls to help maintain shape and provide structural stability. Instead, these eukaryotic cells secrete a sticky mass of carbohydrates and proteins into the spaces between adjacent cells. This network of proteins and molecules is called an extracellular matrix or ECM.
Some ECM proteins assemble into a basement membrane to which the remaining components adhere. Proteoglycans typically form the bulk of the ECM while fibrous proteins, like collagen,...
Activation of Integrins01:15

Activation of Integrins

Integrins bind ligands and transmit information from outside the cell to inside or vice-versa through an "outside-in signaling" or "inside-out signaling."
In "outside-in signaling," external factors in the extracellular space bind to exposed ligand binding sites on integrins. This causes the inactive protein to undergo a conformational change to become active. Integrins are often clustered on the cell membrane. Repetitive and regularly spaced ligand binding events provide an effective stimulus.