Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quality control and validation.

Gerard J Kleywegt1

  • 1Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University Biomedical Center, Uppsala, Sweden.

Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.)
|December 19, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Chart builder: an interactive tool for user driven data visualization in the electron microscopy data bank.

Frontiers in bioinformatics·2026
Same author

EMICSS: added-value annotations for EMDB entries.

Bioinformatics advances·2025
Same author

MIFA: Metadata, Incentives, Formats and Accessibility guidelines to improve the reuse of AI datasets for bioimage analysis.

Nature methods·2025
Same author

Ten recommendations for organising bioimaging data for archival.

F1000Research·2024
Same author

Community recommendations on cryoEM data archiving and validation.

IUCrJ·2024
Same author

Community recommendations on cryoEM data archiving and validation: Outcomes of a wwPDB/EMDB workshop on cryoEM data management, deposition and validation.

ArXiv·2023

Quality control and validation are crucial for ensuring the accuracy and reliability of crystallographic models. These processes identify and correct errors before model analysis and publication, guaranteeing dependable research outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Crystallography
  • Structural Biology
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Accurate crystallographic models are essential for understanding molecular structures and functions.
  • The model building and refinement process can introduce errors that compromise data reliability.
  • Ensuring the quality of crystallographic data is critical for scientific integrity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To delineate the distinct roles of quality control and validation in crystallographic structure determination.
  • To emphasize the importance of identifying and rectifying errors during intermediate stages of model development.
  • To highlight the necessity of assessing final model reliability before analysis, publication, and deposition.

Main Methods:

  • Quality control involves analyzing intermediate crystallographic models for unusual features indicative of errors.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Validation assesses the reliability of the final crystallographic model, including specific regions like active sites.
  • Both methods focus on ensuring the accuracy and trustworthiness of the determined molecular structures.

    • Main Results:

    • Quality control identifies potential errors in intermediate models, enabling timely correction.
    • Validation confirms the reliability of the final model for subsequent scientific use.
    • Implementing these processes enhances the overall quality and dependability of crystallographic results.

    Conclusions:

    • Quality control and validation are indispensable steps in the crystallographic workflow.
    • These procedures safeguard against the dissemination of inaccurate structural data.
    • Rigorous quality assessment ultimately supports robust scientific discovery and application.