Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026
Measuring Biophysical and Psychological Stress Levels Following Visitation to Three Locations with Differing Levels of Nature
Published on: June 19, 2019
Specificity assessment of immunoassay kits for determination of urinary free cortisol concentrations
Hitoshi Horie1, Takeshi Kidowaki, Yuhei Koyama
1Mitsubishi Kagaku Bio-Clinical Laboratories, INC., 3-30-1 Shimura, Itabashi-ku, and Department of Clinical Laboratories, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. h-horie@nm.mbcl.co.jp
Background:
In immunoassay kits for determination of urinary free cortisol (UFC) concentrations, the results vary markedly from kit to kit, so we compared in this study the reaction specificity among 4 commercially available immunoassay kits to determine the applicability of these assays in routine determination of UFC concentrations.
Method:
Using 4 commercially available kits, cross-reaction was investigated. In addition, urine samples were fractionated by HPLC to investigate endogenous immunoreactive cortisol responses. HPLC fractions were subjected to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GCMS) to identify substances causing inter-kit assay discrepancies.
Results:
Among the 4 kits, cortisol Kit "TFB" (Immunotech; IOT-RIA method) showed the lowest cross-reaction (2.5%) for prednisolone. Furthermore, on HPLC, 87.8% of the reaction of the entire fraction was seen in the fractions corresponding to the elution position of standard cortisol with the IOT-RIA method; this was the highest percentage among the 4 kits. GCMS revealed that the substance that showed a cross-reaction with the other 3 kits was 5alpha-tetrahydrocortisol (5alpha-THF) glucuronide.
Conclusions:
The IOT-RIA method was found to be the most specific for UFC. The other 3 commercially available kits showed cross-reaction with a conjugate of 5alpha-THF, found to be one of the causes of inter-kit assay discrepancies.
