Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

A Sensitive and Specific Quantitation Method for Determination of Serum Cardiac Myosin Binding Protein-C by Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassay
Published on: August 8, 2013
Method comparison of cardiac marker assays on PATHFAST, StratusCS, AxSYM, Immulite 2000, triage, elecsys and cardiac
Dirk Peetz1, Rosemarie Schweigert, Nicole Jachmann
1Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany. peetz@zentrallabor.klinik.uni-mainz.de
Insights
This study compared cardiac marker assays on the PATHFAST analyzer to other platforms. PATHFAST cardiac troponin I (cTnI), CK-MB, myoglobin, and NT-proBNP assays showed good correlation with established methods.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Immunoassay Technology
- Cardiovascular Diagnostics
Background:
- Accurate measurement of cardiac biomarkers is crucial for diagnosing cardiovascular diseases.
- The PATHFAST analyzer offers automated immunoassay capabilities for cardiac markers.
- Method comparison studies are essential to validate new diagnostic platforms against existing ones.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the performance of cardiac marker assays (cardiac troponin I, CK-MB, myoglobin, NT-proBNP) on the automated PATHFAST Immuno-Assay Analyzer.
- To assess the correlation of PATHFAST assays with immunoassays on other commercially available platforms.
Main Methods:
- Method comparison of PATHFAST assays for cTnI, CK-MB, myoglobin, and NT-proBNP against multiple commercial immunoanalyzers.
- Utilized plasma samples from patients with cardiovascular diseases (n=118 for cTnI, CK-MB, myoglobin; n=90 for NT-proBNP).
- Employed immunochemiluminescent sandwich assays on the PATHFAST, with calibration traceable to NIST and IRMM-IFCC reference materials.
Main Results:
- High correlation coefficients were observed for cTnI (0.953-0.982), myoglobin (0.776-0.992), and CK-MB (0.835-0.999) compared to other methods, with the Triage System showing the lowest correlation.
- PATHFAST NT-proBNP demonstrated very good correlation (r=0.992) against the Roche Elecsys assay.
- Considerable variation in regression line slopes indicated a need for international standardization to harmonize results.
Conclusions:
- The PATHFAST analyzer demonstrates good correlation with other immunoassay platforms for key cardiac markers.
- The developed cardiac marker assays on the PATHFAST system exhibit analytical reliability.
- Further standardization efforts are necessary to achieve consistent results across different immunoassay methods.
Abstract:
The purpose of this evaluation was to perform a method comparison of the assays for cardiac troponin I (cTnl), CK-MB, myoglobin, and NT-proBNP on the automated PATHFAST Immuno-Assay Analyzer with respective immunoassays on other commercially available immunoanalyzers. The PATHFAST assays are immunochemiluminescent assays (in single reagent cartridges) employing two mono- or polyclonal antibodies in a sandwich test format. The calibration materials for cTnI and CK-MB are standardized to the reference materials NIST SRM 2921 (troponin CIT complex) and IRMM-IFCC 455 (CK-MB mass). The PATHFAST assays for cTnI, CK-MB, myoglobin, and NT-proBNP on the PATHFAST Analyzer were compared using 118 (NT-proBNP: 90) plasma samples from patients with different cardiovascular diseases with those on the Dade Behring StratusCS Analyzer, on the Abbott AxSYM System, on the DPC IMMMULITE 2000 Analyzer, on the Biosite Triage Meter Plus System, on the Roche Elecsys Immuno Analyzer 2010 and Roche Cardiac Reader System, respectively. The correlation coefficients for the comparison of cTnI methods ranged from 0.953 to 0.982, those for the comparison of myoglobin methods ranged from 0.776 to 0.992, and those for the comparison of CK-MB methods ranged from 0.835 to 0.999, with the Triage System giving in all comparisons the lowest correlation. Also the comparison of PATHFAST NTproBNP against the Roche Elecsys assay yielded a very good correlation (r = 0.992). The slopes of the regression line among methods showed considerable variation indicating that standardization efforts by international groups are indispensable to achieve harmonization of results. In summary, this evaluation study confirms the overall good correlation of the results obtained with assays for cardiac markers developed on the PATHFAST analyzer with those on other immunoassay platforms and thus the analytical reliability of the developed methods.
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System I:Echocardiography
Indications: Echocardiography is utilized to diagnose heart failure, valve disorders, and myocardial infarction. It also assesses cardiac structures' size, shape, and motion, evaluates...
