Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

A Simple Planting Technique for Re-establishing Trees Where Frequent Inundation Occurs
Published on: January 26, 2018
Can Florida become like the next Florida? When metaphoric comparisons fail
Sam Glucksberg1, Catrinel Haught
1Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. samg@princeton.edu
Abstract:
Metaphors can be understood in either of two ways: via a comparison process or via a categorization process. What determines which process will be used? According to a recent variant of comparison theory, novel metaphors must be processed as comparisons; only conventional metaphors can be processed as categorizations. We argue that choice of process is determined not by conventionality, but instead by the semantic and referential properties of the metaphor itself. We identified a type of novel metaphor that is indeed understood more quickly as a comparison than as a categorization. We then generated variants of such metaphors to make comparison difficult and found that these new novel metaphors were understood more quickly as categorizations than as comparisons. We conclude that metaphors can be processed as categorizations from the start, depending on their semantic and referential properties.
Related Concept Videos
Conservation of Small Populations
Magical Thinking
Modeling and Similitude
Cognitive Dissonance
Properties of Limits in Multivariable Calculus
States of Water
Water freezes when the intermolecular forces are greater than the kinetic energy. Unlike most other substances, water is less dense in its solid state than in its liquid state. This is because each water molecule can form...

