Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

07:47
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
Published on: January 9, 2016
Are juvenile offenders extreme future discounters?
1Depatrtment of Psychology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. wilson@mcmaster.ca
Psychological Science
|December 21, 2006
Summary
Contrary to popular belief, young offenders do not discount the future more than their peers. This study found no significant differences in future-oriented decision-making between young offenders and a control group.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Criminology
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Prevailing view suggests young offenders exhibit greater present orientation than peers.
- This assumption lacks robust empirical support, often based on offender actions rather than cognitive assessments.
- Understanding future-discounting tendencies is crucial for developmental psychology and criminal justice interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To empirically assess future-discounting tendencies in young offenders compared to a control group.
- To investigate whether personality traits (sensation-seeking) and demographic factors correlate with future-discounting.
- To examine the clarity of future vision in young offenders.
Main Methods:
- A decision-making task with monetary consequences was employed to measure future discounting.
- Participants included young offenders and a control group of high school students.
- A future milestones task assessed participants' ability to anticipate life events.
Main Results:
- Young offenders did not significantly differ from the control group in future discounting.
- Young offenders exhibited higher sensation-seeking scores and different demographic backgrounds (father presence, school changes).
- Both groups showed similar abilities in anticipating future milestones.
Conclusions:
- The study challenges the notion that young offenders are inherently more present-oriented.
- Future-discounting behavior does not appear to be a distinguishing cognitive factor between young offenders and peers.
- Personality and environmental factors, rather than future orientation, may better differentiate these groups.
Related Concept Videos
Conduct Disorder
Conduct disorder is a complex mental health diagnosis characterized by a repetitive and persistent pattern of behavior that violates societal norms, the rights of others, or age-appropriate rules. The diagnostic criteria for conduct disorder require the presence of at least three problematic behaviors within the past 12 months, with at least one occurring in the past six months. These behaviors are grouped into four categories: aggression toward people and animals; destruction of property;...
Antisocial Personality Disorder
Antisocial personality disorder is a chronic mental health condition characterized by persistent patterns of disregard for the rights and well-being of others. Individuals with antisocial personality disorder exhibit behaviors that include deceitfulness, impulsivity, irresponsibility, aggression, and a profound lack of empathy. These traits often manifest early in life and persist into adulthood, leading to significant personal, social, and legal consequences.
Behavioral Characteristics and...
Behavioral Characteristics and...
Punishment
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
Absolute and Local Extreme Values
The highest and lowest values of a function, relative to a reference axis, are known as extreme values. These include absolute maximum and absolute minimum values, which represent the highest and lowest points the function reaches across its entire domain. Within a restricted portion of the function, the highest and lowest values are referred to as local maximum and local minimum values, respectively.Periodic functions, such as sine and cosine, show extreme values at infinitely many points due...
Unrealistic Optimism Bias
Unrealistic optimism bias is the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of positive outcomes. This cognitive bias makes individuals believe they are less likely to experience failures, setbacks, or risks and more likely to succeed than others. For example, people may assume they are less prone to health issues, accidents, or financial struggles than their peers, even when they share similar risk factors.One key component of this bias is the above-average effect, where individuals perceive...
Oppositional Defiant Disorder
A persistent pattern of angry or irritable mood, defiant behavior, or vindictiveness characterizes Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD). Symptoms must occur over at least six months, involve interactions with individuals beyond siblings, and meet specific diagnostic criteria to be clinically significant. The disorder affects emotional regulation, social interactions, and behavior, often manifesting early in life and influencing long-term development and functioning.
Diagnostic Criteria and...
Diagnostic Criteria and...

