Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Basophil Activation Test for Allergy Diagnosis
Published on: May 31, 2021
Information derived from sensitization test methods: test sensitivity, false positives and false negatives
David A Basketter1, Ian Kimber
1Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre, Unilever, Bedford, UK. david.basketter@unilever.com
Abstract:
Predictive toxicology tests for the prospective identification of skin-sensitizing chemicals are well known and have been used for many years. However, of these, only the local lymph node assay (LLNA) has actually undergone formal independent assessment to determine the accuracy of the predictions, particularly with respect to the likelihood of false positives and false negatives. Often, efforts to increase the sensitivity of a test (reducing false negatives) tend to increase the number of false positives. In this short review, these issues are discussed in particular relation to the 3 predictive tests available in regulatory toxicology, the guinea-pig maximization test, the occluded patch test of Buehler and the LLNA. A key perspective is that no predictive test is without limitations; having a good appreciation of these limitations is necessary for making the best use of the information derived from these methods.
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
Pulmonary Tuberculosis IV
Several diagnostic approaches are used to detect TB. The conventional method is the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), also known as the Mantoux test. However, this method has...
Errors In Hypothesis Tests
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot
