Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Surgical simulation: a current review.

B Dunkin1, G L Adrales, K Apelgren

  • 1Department of Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.

Surgical Endoscopy
|December 21, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Gender disparity in the journal hernia and its affiliated societies.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2024
Same author

International classification of abdominal wall planes (ICAP) to describe mesh insertion for ventral hernia repair.

The British journal of surgery·2019
Same author

Surgineering: curriculum concept for experiential learning in upper-level biomedical engineering.

International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery·2019
Same author

The SAGES Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy program (FUSE): history, development, and purpose.

Surgical endoscopy·2017
Same author

Educational implications for surgical telementoring: a current review with recommendations for future practice, policy, and research.

Surgical endoscopy·2017
Same author

Design and implementation of the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC): improving value in hernia care.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2016
Same journal

Efficacy and safety of transoral incisionless fundoplication in non-obese and obese adults: a population-based cohort study from the United States.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Minimally invasive versus open surgery for adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Enhanced view/extended totally extraperitoneal plasty (eTEP) Rives-Stoppa repair versus open Rives-Stoppa repair: a single-center retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Robotic-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection: a scoping review of preclinical and early clinical evidence.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Conversion of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty to bariatric surgery.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Artificial intelligence and chatbots in general surgery: a survey among surgeons in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
See all related articles

Surgical simulation tools enhance preclinical skill acquisition, offering educational and safety benefits. Further validation is needed, but early data show promise for improving surgical training and competency assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education Technology
  • Surgical Skill Development
  • Simulation-Based Training

Background:

  • Simulation tools offer preclinical surgical skill acquisition opportunities.
  • Increasing attention is given to educational, safety, cost, and outcome benefits.
  • Potential applications include ongoing assessment and documentation of surgical proficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current status of simulation in surgical education.
  • To highlight available simulator options.
  • To discuss the future impact of simulation on surgical training.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of simulation tools in surgical education.
  • Analysis of early data on simulator validity and clinical benefit.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of available simulator options and future trends.
  • Main Results:

    • Simulation offers potential benefits for surgical skill acquisition and assessment.
    • Face and construct validity are suggested by early data.
    • Significant work remains in validating simulation for specific surgical skills (e.g., endoscopic, laparoscopic).

    Conclusions:

    • Simulation-based preclinical skills development shows potential for clinical benefit.
    • Further validation is required for widespread adoption in surgical training.
    • Simulation modalities are poised to impact the future of surgical education.