Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

19:15
Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
National evaluation of US newborn screening system components
Bradford L Therrell1, W Harry Hannon
1National Newborn Screening and Genetics Resource Center, Austin, Texas 78757, USA. therrell@uthscsa.edu
Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews
|December 22, 2006
Summary
A national newborn screening policy is absent in the U.S., leading to program variations. Enhancing national evaluation strategies requires comprehensive data and resources for improved newborn screening quality.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Genetics
- Pediatrics
Background:
- Newborn screening programs have operated at the state level since the 1960s, with all states and most territories having comprehensive programs.
- A unified national newborn screening policy is absent in the United States, resulting in significant variations in administrative structures, screening protocols, laboratory services, and follow-up care across different regions.
- Federal initiatives have supported limited national evaluations, but consistent funding remains a challenge for comprehensive assessment and improvement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the current state of national newborn screening policies and their impact on program consistency and effectiveness.
- To identify challenges and opportunities for improving the national newborn screening system through enhanced evaluation strategies.
- To explore the role of federal initiatives in promoting harmonization and quality improvement across diverse state-based programs.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of existing federal initiatives and their impact on state-level newborn screening programs.
- Review of national evaluation strategies employed for newborn screening laboratory practices and other program elements.
- Assessment of participation and success rates of various national evaluation activities.
Main Results:
- While national evaluation of laboratory practices has improved quality and harmonized protocols across all US programs, other national evaluation efforts have yielded only moderate success.
- Significant variations persist in administrative infrastructures, screening requirements, laboratory and follow-up services, and medical management approaches nationwide due to the lack of a national policy.
- Limited federal actions, such as grant incentives and reporting requirements, have shown some success in encouraging participation in national harmonization efforts.
Conclusions:
- A comprehensive, real-time national evaluation system for newborn screening is crucial for system-wide improvement but requires additional resources and enforcement incentives.
- Achieving universal acceptance and timely reporting of quality indicators is essential for effective national evaluation and improvement of newborn screening.
- Strengthening federal support and implementing consistent national policies are necessary to harmonize newborn screening programs and ensure equitable care for all infants.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Evaluation
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Section...
Genetic Screens
Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...
Automated Microbial Diagnostics
Automated diagnostic analyzers have transformed clinical microbiology by providing rapid and reliable methods for pathogen identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Among these systems, the Vitek 2 is widely used because it automates the traditionally labor-intensive processes of microbial identification (ID) and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST), delivering standardized and timely results that are essential for effective patient care.Microbial Identification with ID CardsThe...
