Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Pulsed Wave Doppler Assessment of Diastolic Dysfunction in the ZSF-1 Rat Model of Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Left Heart Disease
Published on: May 22, 2026
Diastolic heart failure: a separate disease or selection bias?
Gilles W De Keulenaer1, Dirk L Brutsaert
1Department of Physiology, University of Antwerp, and Division of Cardiology, Middelheim Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium. gilles.dekeulenaer@ua.ac.be
Insights
Chronic heart failure (CHF) is not two separate conditions but a spectrum. Current research approaches, often biased, should be revised to view CHF as one disease influencing diverse phenotypes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Internal Medicine
Background:
- Chronic heart failure (CHF) is traditionally classified into diastolic and systolic forms based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
- This binary classification has guided clinical trials and conceptual models of CHF for years.
Observation:
- This review argues against the LVEF-based bimodal view of CHF.
- The current understanding of CHF lacks a strong pathophysiological basis for this division.
- Clinical trials for CHF have historically suffered from selection biases related to LVEF subgroups.
Findings:
- CHF should be conceptualized as a single pathophysiological entity with a spectrum of phenotypes.
- The traditional "diastolic" and "systolic" heart failure categories are not pathophysiologically distinct.
- Existing conceptual models, like the vicious circle paradigm, become obsolete under this unified view.
Implications:
- Future research should treat CHF as one disease, moving beyond LVEF-based selection biases.
- Investigating how factors like sex, diabetes, and hypertension modify CHF phenotypes is crucial.
- A unified approach will enable a more accurate understanding and treatment of heart failure diversity.
Abstract:
Chronic heart failure (CHF) is often subdivided based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in 2 distinct forms, usually specified as "diastolic heart failure" and "systolic heart failure." In this review, arguments are provided against an LVEF-based bimodal view, and CHF is presented as one pathophysiological identity encompassing a continuous spectrum of closely related phenotypes. Most importantly, there is currently no pathophysiological basis to support a bimodal view. As a result, conceptual presentations of CHF, such as the vicious circle paradigm of CHF, become obsolete. Furthermore, the binary view of CHF is the unfortunate result of selection biases that has confounded practically all clinical trials of CHF. Unfortunately, current investigations still introduce selection bias when studying heart failure at preserved or reduced LVEF. Future investigations should analyze CHF as one disease and focus on the mechanisms through which disease modifiers such as sex, diabetes, and hypertension induce phenotypic diversity.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send blood...
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
