Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Eyewitness Memory

Eyewitness Memory

Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...

Sources of Law

Sources of Law

Laws form the essential rules set by governing authorities to shape and control societal behavior. In nursing, laws guide actions, safeguard patient rights, define nurses' scope of practice, and maintain professional standards. Understanding the legal framework governing nursing involves recognizing four primary sources of law: constitutional, statutory, administrative (regulatory), and common law.
Constitutional law is foundational, deriving from federal and state constitutions, and...

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.

Conduct Disorder

Conduct Disorder

Conduct disorder is a complex mental health diagnosis characterized by a repetitive and persistent pattern of behavior that violates societal norms, the rights of others, or age-appropriate rules. The diagnostic criteria for conduct disorder require the presence of at least three problematic behaviors within the past 12 months, with at least one occurring in the past six months. These behaviors are grouped into four categories: aggression toward people and animals; destruction of property;...

Torts II

Torts II

Intentional torts in healthcare refer to deliberate actions that cause harm or infringe on the rights of others. Understanding these torts is crucial for healthcare professionals to avoid legal liabilities and maintain ethical standards in patient care.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The shape of justice: Sentencing of mentally ill defendants convicted of manslaughter.

Medicine, science, and the law·2025

Same author

Legal and human rights issues in the use of electronic monitoring (using GPS 'tracking' technology) in forensic mental health settings in the UK.

Medicine, science, and the law·2023

Same author

Over 30 years of liaison and diversion in England and Wales: How far have we come, and what is now needed?

Medicine, science, and the law·2022

Same author

Liaison and diversion services in South East London: Referral patterns over a 25-year period.

The Medico-legal journal·2021

Same author

The mental health of foreign national prisoners.

Journal of forensic and legal medicine·2019

Same author

The WPA-Lancet Psychiatry Commission on the Future of Psychiatry.

The lancet. Psychiatry·2017

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 18, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

Commentary: UK perspective on competency to stand trial.

¹Redford Lodge Hospital, Department of Forensic Mental Health Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Denmark Hill, London, United Kingdom. t_exworthy@hotmail.com

The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

|December 23, 2006

Summary

Fitness to plead, the legal standard for competency to stand trial in England and Wales, is an historical concept with minimal evolution. Recent jurisprudence emphasizes fair trial requirements under the European Convention on Human Rights.

More Related Videos

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 18, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

Area of Science:

Legal Studies
Criminal Law
Human Rights Law

Background:

Competency to stand trial, termed 'fitness to plead' in England and Wales, is a critical legal concept.
The historical intellectual test for fitness to plead has seen limited evolution.
Statutory amendments have altered procedures and outcomes for those found unfit to plead.

Purpose of the Study:

To provide a comparative perspective on fitness to plead from England and Wales.
To examine the principle of proportionality in legal and healthcare contexts.
To analyze recent legal developments concerning fair trial requirements.

Main Methods:

Comparative legal analysis of common law jurisdictions.
Review of historical case law and statutory amendments.
Examination of domestic and European jurisprudence.

Main Results:

Fitness to plead remains a more marginal issue in England and Wales compared to the United States.
The core intellectual test for fitness to plead has evolved minimally.
Recent legal developments are influenced by European human rights standards.

Conclusions:

The concept of fitness to plead in England and Wales, while historically rooted, is increasingly shaped by fair trial principles.
Proportionality serves as a comparative lens for understanding legal and healthcare decisions.
European jurisprudence plays a significant role in the ongoing consideration of trial competency.