Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Commentary: It's about the fundamentals.

John L Young1

  • 1Whiting Forensic Division, Connecticut Valley Hospital, Box 70, Middletown, CT 06457, USA. jlmyoung@pol.net

The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
|December 23, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Expanding the Contours of Forensic Consulting.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2020
Same author

Truth as Humility Nourishing Compassion Through Wisdom.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2018
Same author

Clinicians' Need for an Ecological Approach to Violence Reduction.

AMA journal of ethics·2018
Same author

Michael Albert Norko, MD, MAR: Forensic Psychiatry is a Vocation.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2017
Same author

Transporting Forensic Psychiatric Patients.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2015
Same author

Commentary: is the plot thickening for partisan forensic expert witnesses?

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2015
Same journal

National Survey of Undergraduate and Graduate Medical Education Exposure to Correctional Psychiatry.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
Same journal

Pregnancy Criminalization in the United States.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
Same journal

In Reply.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
Same journal

Letter.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
Same journal

The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Practice Resource for Managing Violence in State Hospitals with Forensic Patients.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
Same journal

Plea Bargaining Participation and Competency Evaluation Considerations.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
See all related articles

Health professionals should avoid direct involvement in hostile interrogations, as major associations agree. Debates continue on indirect roles and the ethical basis of medical guidelines.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Psychiatry
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • Growing consensus among major medical and psychological associations advises against direct health professional involvement in hostile interrogations.
  • Ethical challenges persist regarding indirect involvement, including training for humane and reliable interrogation procedures.
  • Some experts question the fundamental basis of medical ethics, suggesting it may not be binding.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the ethical considerations for health professionals regarding involvement in interrogations.
  • To highlight the ongoing debate on the permissibility of indirect involvement in interrogation practices.
  • To underscore the critical role of forensic psychiatrists in addressing these ethical dilemmas.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of recent policy statements from key professional organizations (American Psychiatric Association, American Medical Association, American Psychological Association).
  • Analysis of arguments concerning indirect involvement in interrogation training and procedures.
  • Examination of philosophical challenges to the foundations of medical ethics.

    • Main Results:

    • A significant consensus exists against direct participation in hostile interrogations.
    • The permissibility of indirect involvement, such as training, remains a contentious issue.
    • Radical challenges to the validity of medical ethics principles have been raised.

    Conclusions:

    • Forensic psychiatrists play a vital role in navigating the complex ethical landscape of interrogation practices.
    • Further discourse is necessary to reconcile professional obligations with interrogation contexts.
    • The foundational principles of medical ethics require continued defense against radical critiques.