Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
Published on: September 27, 2024
Perceptual bias in speech error data collection: insights from Spanish speech errors
Elvira Pérez1, Julio Santiago, Alfonso Palma
1Departamento de Psicología Experimental y Fisiología del Comportamiento, Universidad de Granada, Campus de Cartuja, 18179 Granada, Spain.
This study validates naturalistic speech errors for language production research, finding Spanish errors differ from Germanic languages. Data collection methods appear largely unbiased, suggesting genuine cross-linguistic variations in speech production.
Area of Science:
- Linguistics
- Psycholinguistics
- Speech Production
Background:
- Naturalistic speech errors are a valuable tool for studying language production.
- Potential biases in data collection can affect the reliability of speech error analysis.
- Previous research primarily focused on Germanic languages, with limited data from Romance languages.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the reliability and validity of naturalistic speech errors in language production research.
- To identify and mitigate potential biases in collecting speech error data.
- To compare speech error patterns in Spanish with those reported for Germanic languages.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of a new corpus of Spanish speech errors collected by multiple, theoretically naïve observers.
- Comparison of findings with existing corpora of speech errors from English, German, Dutch, and Spanish.
- Identification of specific patterns in Spanish speech errors, such as phonological error location, consonant position, syllable stress, error directionality (perseveration vs. anticipation), and lexical bias.
Main Results:
- Spanish speech errors exhibit patterns contrary to predictions based on bias, including more errors between words, less involvement of word-initial consonants, equal error likelihood in stressed/unstressed syllables, more perseverations than anticipations, and no lexical bias.
- Results from the new Spanish corpus were consistent with previous reports, even with different collection methods.
- Despite potential susceptibility to bias, collecting speech errors in the wild with multiple collectors appears reasonably unbiased.
Conclusions:
- Naturalistic speech error collection is a largely unbiased method for language production research.
- Observed differences in speech error patterns between Spanish and Germanic languages represent genuine cross-linguistic variations.
- The findings support the use of naturalistic speech errors for robust cross-linguistic studies in language production.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying
Motivational Bias
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Hindsight Biases

