Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Repeated measurement sampling in genetic association analysis with genotyping errors.

Renzhen Lai1, Hong Zhang, Yaning Yang

  • 1Department of Statistics and Finance, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.

Genetic Epidemiology
|December 26, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Genotyping errors in human genetic studies can be addressed using repeated measurements. This method improves statistical power, especially when genotyping costs are high or error rates are significant.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Control of spiral breakup by an alternating advective field.

The Journal of chemical physics·2006
Same author

Inhibition of growth and metastasis of human hepatocellular carcinoma by antisense oligonucleotide targeting signal transducer and activator of transcription 3.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2006
Same author

New rod-plate anterior instrumentation for thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis: biomechanical evaluation compared with dual-rod and single-rod with structural interbody support.

Spine·2006
Same author

Dimeric ansamycins--a new class of antitumor Hsp90 modulators with prolonged inhibitory activity.

International journal of cancer·2006
Same author

A unified mode of epigenetic gene silencing: RNA meets polycomb group proteins.

RNA biology·2006
Same author

Molecular signaling and genetic pathways of senescence: Its role in tumorigenesis and aging.

Journal of cellular physiology·2006

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Statistical Genetics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Genotype misclassification is a common issue in human genetic association studies.
  • Existing methods for adjusting genotyping errors often require a known misclassification model or a costly gold standard instrument.
  • Practical scenarios frequently involve unknown misclassification probabilities or unaffordable gold standard assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the application of a repeated measurement design for identifying misclassification probabilities in genetic association analysis.
  • To evaluate the cost-effectiveness and power of the repeated measurement method compared to traditional designs.
  • To determine the impact of genetic factors on the power gain achieved by the repeated measurement approach.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilizing a repeated measurement design where a subset of subjects undergoes multiple genotype measurements (≥5 repeats) under unknown error models.
  • Conducting a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing repeat sampling with regular case-control designs.
  • Assessing the power gain across various genetic models, relative risks, and allele frequencies.

Main Results:

  • The repeated measurement design can enhance statistical power compared to regular case-control designs, particularly when phenotyping-to-genotyping costs are high or misclassification rates are substantial.
  • The observed power gain is robust and not significantly influenced by the genetic model, genetic relative risk, or population high-risk allele frequency.
  • This method offers a viable alternative for accounting for genotyping errors or high phenotyping costs.

Conclusions:

  • The repeated measurement design is a practical and effective strategy for addressing unknown genotype misclassification probabilities in human genetic association studies.
  • This approach provides a significant power gain, making it advantageous when genotyping errors are prevalent or phenotyping is expensive.
  • The method's insensitivity to specific genetic parameters suggests broad applicability across diverse genetic association research settings.