Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Combined Supine and Standing Imaging for Varicocele: An Improved Diagnostic Approach
Published on: November 22, 2024
Screening asymptomatic siblings for vesicoureteral reflux: sound science or religious rhetoric?
1Division of Pediatric Urology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Insights
Screening asymptomatic siblings for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) lacks strong evidence, despite expert opinion. Current practice relies on clinical experience and case factors until definitive research emerges.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Urology
- Medical Screening
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Urologists debate screening asymptomatic siblings of children with vesicoureteral reflux (VUR).
- Concerns exist regarding the cost and potential morbidity of widespread screening programs without robust evidence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the literature on screening programs, reflux, familial reflux, and screening for familial reflux.
- To evaluate the evidence supporting and opposing the screening of asymptomatic siblings for VUR.
Main Methods:
- Comprehensive literature review.
- Analysis of studies on general screening programs, VUR, familial VUR, and familial reflux screening.
Main Results:
- Evidence supporting current surgical and medical management of VUR is limited.
- Evidence supporting the screening of asymptomatic siblings for VUR is currently lacking.
- Public health organizations do not provide guidance on VUR screening, yet peer-reviewed literature and expert opinions support it.
Conclusions:
- A definitive randomized controlled trial for VUR screening would be unprecedented in scale and complexity.
- In the absence of high-quality evidence, VUR screening decisions are based on clinical experience, index case morbidity, and socioeconomic factors.
- Continuous re-evaluation of VUR management strategies is necessary as new information becomes available.
Introduction:
Many urologists endorse the concept of screening asymptomatic siblings of children known to have vesicoureteral reflux. Others oppose screening until there is better evidence to justify the cost and potential morbidity of adopting a widespread screening program.
Methods:
A literature review of the following topics was carried out: 1) screening programs in general; 2) reflux in general; 3) familial reflux; and 4) screening for familial reflux.
Results:
The evidence supporting our traditional surgical and medical management strategies for reflux is weak. The evidence supporting screening is lacking. Public Health organizations do not address the issue of screening for this condition. Despite this, there is a significant body of peer reviewed literature and compelling expert opinion, in support of screening. Possible reasons for this are explored.
Conclusions:
A randomized controlled trial to definitively assess the utility of screening would be larger and more challenging to perform than any ever done in the history of this condition. Until such time that high quality evidence exists, screening of asymptomatic siblings will continue to be based upon our individual clinical experience and teachings, the morbidity of the index case, and socioeconomic factors. We must continue to re-evaluate our management strategies for this condition in light of new information as it accrues.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Nursing Assessment of the Genitourinary System III: Percussion and Auscultation
Urinary Tract Calculi III: Medical Management
Urinary Tract Calculi II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
