Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Questioning the social intelligence hypothesis.

Kay E Holekamp1

  • 1Department of Zoology, 203 Natural Science Building, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1115, USA. holekamp@msu.edu

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|December 26, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Short-term study fails to capture negative impacts of livestock intensification on wildlife.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Behavioral sequences across multiple animal species in the wild share common structural features.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Spotted Hyena skull size variation across geography favors the energetic equivalence rule over Bergmann's Rule.

Journal of mammalogy·2024
Same author

A multispecies hierarchical model to integrate count and distance-sampling data.

Ecology·2024
Same author

Determinants of hyena participation in risky collective action.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2023
Same author

Accelerometer-based predictions of behaviour elucidate factors affecting the daily activity patterns of spotted hyenas.

Royal Society open science·2023
Same journal

Misinformation as strategy: Epistemic consequences and the undermining of shared truth.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Geographical psychology: Spatial variation in psychological phenomena and their consequences.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Multi-brain neurofeedback: what are we training for?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

The developing vocal self.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Searching beyond decrements: Attentional guidance across the adult lifespan.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Looking into working memory through micro eye movements.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
See all related articles

The social intelligence hypothesis suggests complex cognition evolved due to social complexity. However, new data indicate multiple factors, including non-social environmental challenges and evolutionary constraints, also shape cognitive abilities.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary psychology
  • Comparative cognition
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • The social intelligence hypothesis links complex cognition and brain evolution to social complexity.
  • Recent findings present data inconsistent with the social intelligence hypothesis's predictions.
  • A broader theoretical framework is needed to explain cognitive evolution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a new theoretical framework for understanding cognitive evolution.
  • To integrate social and non-social selective pressures.
  • To account for phylogenetic and developmental constraints.

Main Methods:

  • Review and synthesis of existing data on cognitive evolution.
  • Theoretical modeling of selective pressures.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis across species.

    • Main Results:

    • Evidence suggests that social complexity is not the sole driver of cognitive evolution.
    • Non-social environmental factors play a significant role in shaping cognitive abilities.
    • Phylogenetic and developmental constraints interact with selective pressures.

    Conclusions:

    • Cognitive evolution is a multifactorial process.
    • A comprehensive framework must consider social, non-social, and constraint-based factors.
    • Future research should focus on integrating these diverse influences on cognition.