Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Transcutaneous Microcirculatory Imaging in Preterm Neonates
Published on: December 31, 2015
Indomethacin prophylaxis for preterm infants: the impact of 2 multicentered randomized controlled trials on clinical
Ronald I Clyman1, Shampa Saha, Alan Jobe
1Cardiovascular Research Institute and Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0544, USA. clymanr@peds.ucsf.edu
Insights
Publication of two trials impacted indomethacin prophylaxis use in premature infants. The Ment trial increased its use, while the TIPP trial decreased it due to an overly ambitious effect size.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Clinical Trials
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Two multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigated indomethacin prophylaxis in premature infants.
- The Ment trial (1994) showed benefits for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), PDA ligation, and severe intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).
- The TIPP trial (2001) did not find benefits in its primary outcome, potentially discouraging prophylaxis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the association between the Ment and TIPP trials and the clinical use of indomethacin prophylaxis.
- To statistically assess the assumptions underlying the TIPP trial's negative findings.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the National Institute of Child Health and Development's Neonatal Network Registry.
- Analyzed trends in indomethacin prophylaxis use following the publication of each trial.
- Performed statistical assessment of the TIPP trial's effect size calculations.
Main Results:
- Indomethacin prophylaxis use increased among network clinicians after the Ment trial publication.
- Indomethacin prophylaxis use decreased following the TIPP trial publication.
- The TIPP trial's anticipated effect size of >= 20% was deemed too large; a < 3% effect size was more appropriate given the ICH incidence and neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Conclusions:
- The Ment and TIPP RCTs significantly influenced the adoption of indomethacin prophylaxis in premature infants.
- The Ment trial's positive findings led to increased prophylaxis use.
- The TIPP trial's negative results, stemming from an overestimated effect size, led to decreased prophylaxis use.
Objectives:
Two multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in premature infants (Ment et al, 1994 and TIPP, 2001) found beneficial effects of indomethacin prophylaxis on the incidences of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), PDA ligation, and severe intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). The Ment trial recommended the use of indomethacin prophylaxis. The TIPP trial failed to find a benefit in its primary outcome (improved survival/neurodevelopmental outcome); this negative result may have discouraged indomethacin prophylaxis use.
Study Design:
We used the National Institute of Child Health and Development's Neonatal Network Registry to determine the association between the 2 trials and the use of indomethacin prophylaxis. We also statistically assessed the assumptions that led to the TIPP trial's negative results.
Results:
Use of indomethacin prophylaxis among network clinicians increased after publication of the Ment trial and decreased after the TIPP trial. Analysis of the TIPP trial showed that the primary outcome's anticipated effect size (> or = 20%) was too large; a smaller effect size (< 3%) would have been more appropriate based on the incidence of ICH in their population and its association with neurodevelopmental outcome.
Conclusions:
Two multicenter RCTs were associated with changes in indomethacin prophylaxis. After the Ment trial, the use of indomethacin prophylaxis increased. After the TIPP trial, which reported negative results based on an excessively large anticipated effect size, its use decreased.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Teratogenicity
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Intrauterine Drug Delivery Systems

