Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Excess Pressure Inside a Drop and a Bubble

Excess Pressure Inside a Drop and a Bubble

The shape of a small drop of liquid can be considered spherical, neglecting the effect of gravity. This drop can further be considered as two equal hemispherical drops put together due to surface tension. The forces acting on the spherical drop are due to the pressure of the liquid inside the drop, the pressure due to air outside the drop, and the force due to the surface tension acting on the two hemispherical drops.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Ultrasound localisation microscopy tracks testicular microvascular adaptations to endocrine function in male infertility.

EBioMedicine·2026

Same author

Benchmarking Image-Based Motion-Correction Methods for Ultrasound Localization Microscopy.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026

Same author

Microvascular ultrasound imaging of the neonatal brain: a scoping review.

European journal of pediatrics·2026

Same author

Quantitative image markers of super-resolution ultrasound.

EBioMedicine·2026

Same author

Virtual reality interactions via a user-generic ultrasound human-machine interface for wrist and hand tracking.

Nature communications·2025

Same author

Microbubble Contrast Agent Use During Invasive Coronary Microvascular Assessment.

Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions·2025

Same journal

Multidimensional Safety Assessment of a Low-Intensity Scanning Ultrasound (SUS) Protocol in Sheep.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026

Same journal

Acoustic Characterization of a Modified IEC Agar-Based Tissue-Mimicking Material Across the 3.5-50 MHz Frequency Range.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026

Same journal

Deep Learning-Based Standard Section Recognition and Multi-Organ Segmentation in Upper Abdominal Ultrasound.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026

Same journal

Cardiac Natural Mechanical Wave Detection and Speed Estimation Using Deep Learning-Based 2-D Ultrasound Imaging: A Feasibility Study.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026

Same journal

Region-Specific Evaluation of Plaque Segmentation in Cross-sectional Projections of Carotid Ultrasound Images Using Deep Learning Models in a Sub-clinical Atherosclerosis Cohort.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026

Same journal

Simulating the Dedifferentiation Process of Thyroid Cancer: Insights from Mouse Models and Ultrasound Imaging.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Multi-timescale Microscopy Methods for the Characterization of Fluorescently-labeled Microbubbles for Ultrasound-Triggered Drug Release

Multi-timescale Microscopy Methods for the Characterization of Fluorescently-labeled Microbubbles for Ultrasound-Triggered Drug Release

Published on: June 12, 2021

Frequency and pressure dependent attenuation and scattering by microbubbles.

Meng-Xing Tang¹, Robert J Eckersley

¹Wolfson Medical Vision Laboratory, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. mtang@robots.ox.ac.uk

Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

|December 26, 2006

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Microbubble attenuation is pressure-dependent, especially at 1.5 MHz, while scattering is not pressure-dependent. Scattering is highest at lower frequencies (around 1-1.25 MHz) and decreases as frequency increases.

More Related Videos

Induction of Microstreaming by Nonspherical Bubble Oscillations in an Acoustic Levitation System

Induction of Microstreaming by Nonspherical Bubble Oscillations in an Acoustic Levitation System

Published on: May 9, 2021

Studying Cavitation Enhanced Therapy

Studying Cavitation Enhanced Therapy

Published on: April 9, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Multi-timescale Microscopy Methods for the Characterization of Fluorescently-labeled Microbubbles for Ultrasound-Triggered Drug Release

Multi-timescale Microscopy Methods for the Characterization of Fluorescently-labeled Microbubbles for Ultrasound-Triggered Drug Release

Published on: June 12, 2021

Induction of Microstreaming by Nonspherical Bubble Oscillations in an Acoustic Levitation System

Induction of Microstreaming by Nonspherical Bubble Oscillations in an Acoustic Levitation System

Published on: May 9, 2021

Studying Cavitation Enhanced Therapy

Studying Cavitation Enhanced Therapy

Published on: April 9, 2021

Area of Science:

Acoustics
Biomedical Engineering
Materials Science

Background:

Microbubbles are widely used as contrast agents in medical ultrasound imaging.
Understanding their acoustic properties, such as attenuation and scattering, is crucial for optimizing imaging techniques.
Previous studies have explored microbubble behavior, but the pressure dependence of attenuation and scattering at low acoustic pressures requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

To experimentally evaluate the pressure dependence of attenuation and scattering by microbubbles (SonoVue) at low acoustic pressures.
To investigate the frequency dependency of these acoustic properties across a range of 1 to 5 MHz.
To develop and utilize an empirical nonlinear model for analyzing microbubble behavior.

Main Methods:

Transmission and scattering measurements were performed using an automated system.
The microbubble agent SonoVue was used in the experiments.
A range of acoustic pressures and frequencies (1 to 5 MHz) were applied to study pressure and frequency dependencies.

Main Results:

Microbubble attenuation was found to be significantly dependent on acoustic pressure.
No detectable pressure dependence was observed for microbubble scattering.
The pressure dependence of attenuation was most pronounced at 1.5 MHz.
Microbubble scattering intensity was highest at the lowest frequencies tested (approximately 1 to 1.25 MHz) and decreased with increasing frequency.

Conclusions:

Attenuation by microbubbles is a pressure-dependent phenomenon at low acoustic pressures, particularly at 1.5 MHz.
Scattering by microbubbles is not significantly dependent on acoustic pressure within the studied range.
Scattering is frequency-dependent, with optimal performance at lower frequencies, suggesting implications for ultrasound contrast agent design and application.