Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Feature bindings endure without attention: evidence from an explicit recall task.

Daniel A Gajewski1, James R Brockmole

  • 1Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, 211 Psychology Building, East Lansing 48824-1116, USA. dan@eyelab.msu.edu

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|January 5, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Moving beyond discrete categories in motor cognition.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

The time course of the first decision in scene viewing: Perceptual and semantic contributions to initial scene processing.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

The effect of temporal context on memory for art.

Acta psychologica·2024
Same author

A computational modeling approach to investigating mind wandering-related adjustments to gaze behavior during scene viewing.

Cognition·2023
Same author

Interactions among endogenous, exogenous, and agency-driven attentional selection mechanisms in interactive displays.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2022
Same author

Does task-irrelevant music affect gaze allocation during real-world scene viewing?

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2021

Visual working memory stores integrated objects, not independent features. Continued attention is not required to maintain object bindings after encoding, challenging feature independence theories.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Visual working memory (VWM) capacity is debated: are integrated objects or independently stored features the basic unit?
  • Continued attention is hypothesized to maintain feature bindings in VWM.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether visual working memory retains integrated objects or independently stored features when attention is withdrawn.
  • To test the role of continued attention in maintaining feature bindings.

Main Methods:

  • A delayed recall task was employed, probing participants' memory for color and shape of items.
  • Attention during the memory delay was manipulated using an exogenous cueing paradigm.
  • Recall performance was analyzed based on cue validity and feature recall patterns.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Recall accuracy was higher at validly cued positions, confirming cue effects on item memory.
  • On invalid trials, participants predominantly recalled either both features (object memory) or neither, with single-feature recall being infrequent.
  • Single-feature recall rates were significantly lower than predicted by feature independence models.

Conclusions:

  • The findings do not support independent feature storage when attention is withdrawn.
  • Integrated objects appear to be the fundamental unit stored in visual working memory.
  • Continued attention is not necessary for maintaining bindings within stored objects.