Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Psychometric intelligence dissociates implicit and explicit learning.

Guido F Gebauer¹, Nicholas J Mackintosh

¹Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. gebauer@rechtspsychologische-praxis.de

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition

|January 5, 2007

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Pavlov and associationism.

The Spanish journal of psychology·2003

Same journal

Memory loves company: Related object pairs benefit working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026

Same journal

Ranschburg unrepeated.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026

Same journal

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times: Evidence for switch cost beyond stimulus-response tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026

Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026

Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026

Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026

See all related articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Implicit learning is independent of intelligence, unlike explicit learning, which is linked to cognitive abilities. This study found no correlation between implicit learning tasks and intelligence, supporting distinct learning modes.

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Educational Psychology

Background:

Implicit learning is theorized to be independent of general intelligence.
Distinguishing between implicit and explicit learning modes is crucial for understanding cognitive processes.

Purpose of the Study:

To test the hypothesis that implicit learning performance is unrelated to psychometric intelligence.
To investigate the relationship between intelligence and different learning tasks under implicit and explicit instructions.
To examine the assumption of a unitary implicit learning ability.

Main Methods:

A sample of 605 German pupils participated in the study.
Performance was assessed on artificial grammar learning, process control, and serial learning tasks.
Standard implicit and explicit rule discovery instructions were used.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

No significant correlations were found between implicit learning tasks and intelligence measures under standard implicit instructions.
A significant relationship between learning task performance and intelligence emerged under explicit rule discovery instructions.
Correlations among the three implicit learning tasks were negligible.

Conclusions:

Implicit learning appears to be independent of psychometric intelligence, supporting Reber's hypothesis and the distinction between implicit and explicit learning.
The findings do not support the existence of a unitary implicit learning ability.
Cognitive abilities, measured by intelligence, are related to explicit learning but not implicit learning.