Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

09:49
Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
Published on: April 16, 2014
Calibration of visually guided reaching is driven by error-corrective learning and internal dynamics.
1Sloan-Swartz Center for Theoretical Neurobiology, W. M. Keck Center for Integrative Neuroscience, Department of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0444, USA.
Journal of Neurophysiology
|January 5, 2007
Summary
Sensorimotor calibration adapts trial-to-trial to visual feedback shifts. A linear dynamical system models this adaptation, incorporating error signals and internal dynamics like state noise.
Area of Science:
- Motor control
- Computational neuroscience
- Human sensorimotor adaptation
Background:
- Visually guided reaching relies on sensorimotor calibration.
- This calibration adjusts dynamically based on sensory feedback.
- Previous models often simplified the adaptive process.
Purpose of the Study:
- To model the trial-to-trial dynamics of sensorimotor calibration during visually guided reaching.
- To investigate the role of internal dynamics and noise in adaptation.
- To compare adaptation to random versus constant visual feedback shifts.
Main Methods:
- Developed a linear dynamical system model for sensorimotor calibration.
- Introduced an internal state variable representing calibration.
- Used random shifts in visual feedback to probe adaptation dynamics.
Main Results:
- The linear dynamical system effectively models adaptation to visual feedback shifts.
- Subjects adapt to >20% of perceived error, even when unaware of shifts.
- Identified and quantified 'state noise' contributing to adaptation variability.
- Demonstrated comparable contributions of state noise and performance noise to movement variability.
Conclusions:
- Sensorimotor adaptation is a dynamic process accurately modeled by linear systems.
- Internal state noise plays a significant role in adaptation variability.
- Findings generalize across different feedback shift paradigms.

