Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Shared decision-making, gender and new technologies.

Kristin Zeiler1

  • 1Department of Health and Society, Linköping University, Tema Health and Society, Linköping, 590 50, Sweden. krize@ihs.liu.se

Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy
|January 5, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Building science and subjectivity from flesh. Towards a reconceptualization of neurophenomenology as a contribution to interdisciplinary health research.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2026
Same author

Reconceptualizing rehabilitation research via an enactive framework and a radically interdisciplinary cross-analysis: a study protocol on fatigue in post COVID-19 condition (PCC).

Journal of rehabilitation medicine·2025
Same author

Guest Editorial: Medical Humanities and COVID-19/Post-COVID-19 Challenges.

The Journal of medical humanities·2025
Same author

Reimagining illness through post-COVID-19 condition: the need for radically interdisciplinary health research.

Lancet (London, England)·2024
Same author

A Qualitative Phenomenological Philosophy Analysis of Affectivity and Temporality in Experiences of COVID-19 and Remaining Symptoms after COVID-19 in Sweden.

The Journal of medical humanities·2024
Same author

Ethico-Political aspects of clinical judgment in opportunistic screening for cognitive impairment: Arendtian and aristotelian perspectives.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2022

This study explores shared decision-making in medicine when multiple patients are involved, defining conditions for shared and shared autonomous decision-making processes. It highlights distinctions using examples from reproductive medicine and genetics.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Health Psychology

Background:

  • Patient-centered decision-making is common in medicine.
  • Shared decision-making involving multiple patients is less explored.
  • Existing models often assume a single patient.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define conditions for shared decision-making (SDM) with multiple patients.
  • To differentiate between shared decision-making and shared autonomous decision-making (SADM).
  • To explore gender differences in SDM.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of decision-making processes.
  • Literature review on patient involvement in medical choices.
  • Case examples from reproductive medicine and clinical genetics.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Defines criteria for identifying shared and shared autonomous decision-making.
  • Illustrates the application of these concepts in complex medical scenarios.
  • Identifies potential gender-based variations in SDM dynamics.

Conclusions:

  • Distinguishing between SDM and SADM is crucial for understanding complex patient involvement.
  • The framework provided aids in analyzing ethical and practical aspects of multi-patient decision-making.
  • Further research is needed on gender influences in shared medical decision-making.