Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Implementation of Non-invasive Point of Care Transient Elastography for Evaluation of Liver Disease in Pediatric Populations with Cystic Fibrosis
Published on: August 29, 2025
Diagnostic utility of the water load test in children with chronic abdominal pain
Jennifer Verrill Schurman1, Craig A Friesen, Linda Andre
1Section of Developmental & Behavioral Sciences, The Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA. jschurman@cmh.edu
Insights
Children with functional gastrointestinal disorders, especially functional dyspepsia, drank less water during a water load test compared to healthy children. This test showed poor sensitivity for diagnosing functional dyspepsia.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders
- Mechanosensory Dysfunction
Background:
- Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) are common in children, often presenting with recurrent abdominal pain.
- The water load test (WLT) is used to assess gastric function, but its utility in pediatric FGIDs is not well-defined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare water consumption patterns during a WLT in children with FGIDs versus healthy controls.
- To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the WLT for functional dyspepsia (FD) in children.
Main Methods:
- Seventy-one children with recurrent abdominal pain and 26 healthy controls underwent a WLT.
- Diagnoses of FGIDs were based on parent/child reports and clinician assessment.
- Statistical analyses included t tests, ROC curves, and linear regression.
Main Results:
- Children with FGIDs, particularly those with FD, consumed significantly less water than healthy controls.
- The WLT demonstrated high specificity but low sensitivity for identifying pediatric FD.
- Clinician evaluation was more effective than the WLT in differentiating FGIDs.
Conclusions:
- The WLT is not a sensitive diagnostic tool for pediatric functional dyspepsia.
- Further research is needed to explore if the WLT identifies a subset of FD patients with specific mechanosensory dysfunction.
- Investigating the WLT's predictive value for treatment response in pediatric FGIDs is warranted.
Objectives:
To compare water load test consumption patterns between children with functional gastrointestinal disorders and healthy control children.
Methods:
Seventy-one children with recurrent abdominal pain completed the Behavioral Assessment Scale for Children-Self-Report Form and the Questionnaire on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms during their first visit to a pediatric gastroenterology clinic. Parent- and child-report functional gastrointestinal diagnoses were based on the Questionnaire on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms scoring criteria, whereas the clinician's diagnosis was based on clinical impression from history and physical examination completed at this visit. Twenty-six healthy children also participated as controls. Statistical comparisons involved Student t tests, whereas receiver operating characteristic curves estimated sensitivity/specificity of the water load test and linear regression determined the amount of variance accounted for in water volume consumption.
Results:
Children with recurrent abdominal pain, particularly those with a diagnosis of functional dyspepsia, consumed less water than healthy children on the water load test. The water load test demonstrated good specificity, but poor sensitivity, in identifying patients with functional dyspepsia. Clinician evaluation provided the greatest differentiation between functional gastrointestinal disorders on the water load test.
Conclusions:
The water load test seems to be a poor diagnostic test for functional dyspepsia because of poor sensitivity. However, future research should examine whether the water load test is identifying a subset of children with functional dyspepsia experiencing a specific mechanosensory dysfunction and whether the water load test can predict clinical response to specific therapeutic interventions.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection.
Assessment of the Abdomen II: Percussion
Percussion
Percussion is an essential...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Nursing Assessment of the Genitourinary System III: Percussion and Auscultation
Assessment of the Abdomen III: Palpation
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...