Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Perspectives on ethics.

C Parker1

  • 1St James's University Hospital, Clinical Sciences Building, Room 5.2, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK. Elaine.hazell@leedsth.nhs.uk

Journal of Medical Ethics
|January 9, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Advanced and metastatic prostate cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2026
Same author

Local and locoregional prostate cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2025
Same author

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Oligoprogression in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Early Toxicity Analysis of the TRAP Trial.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2024
Same author

HISTOMONAS MELEAGRIDIS INFECTIONS IN TURKEYS IN THE USA: A CENTURY OF PROGRESS, RESURGENCE, AND TRIBUTE TO ITS EARLY INVESTIGATORS, THEOBALD SMITH, ERNST TYZZER, AND EVERETT LUND.

The Journal of parasitology·2024
Same author

The STAMPEDE2 Trial: a Site Survey of Current Patterns of Care, Access to Imaging and Treatment of Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2023
Same author

Effects of 24-week prebiotic intervention on self-reported upper respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, and markers of immunity in elite rugby union players.

European journal of sport science·2023
Same journal

Assisted dying and autonomy as an end in itself: a response to Donaldson.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics briefing.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Medical ethics and categorisation.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
See all related articles

Boyd’s perspective-based approach to ethical issues, using hermeneutics for conversation, lacks clarity. His theory fails to improve communication or address real-world controversies like stem cell research ethics.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Communication Theory

Background:

  • Critiques Boyd's perspective-based approach to ethical issues.
  • Examines the application of hermeneutics in ethical discourse.
  • Highlights the limitations of contrasting conversation and controversy.

Discussion:

  • Argues Boyd's undefined contrast between conversation and controversy does not enhance communication.
  • Contends that disputes can occur in conversations and controversies can be civil.
  • Questions the plausibility of Boyd's attempts to integrate virtues into hermeneutic theory.

Key Insights:

  • Boyd's approach offers no demonstrable improvement in understanding ethical issues.
  • The distinction between conversation and controversy is not effectively utilized by Boyd.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Hermeneutic theory requires clearer articulation for practical ethical application.
  • Outlook:

    • Suggests a need for more robust theoretical frameworks in bioethics.
    • Emphasizes the importance of clearly defined concepts in ethical communication.
    • Recommends applying ethical theories to concrete controversies, such as stem cell research.