Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
DNA as a Genetic Template02:05

DNA as a Genetic Template

Two structural features of the DNA molecule provide a basis for the mechanisms of heredity: the four nucleotide bases and its double-stranded nature. The Watson-Crick model of double-helical DNA structure, proposed in 1952, drew heavily upon the X-ray crystallography work of researchers Rosalind Franklin and Maurice Wilkins. Watson, Crick, and Wilkins jointly received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their work in 1962. Franklin was, controversially, excluded from the prize for...
DNA as a Genetic Template02:05

DNA as a Genetic Template

Two structural features of the DNA molecule provide a basis for the mechanisms of heredity: the four nucleotide bases and its double-stranded nature. The Watson-Crick model of double-helical DNA structure, proposed in 1952, drew heavily upon the X-ray crystallography work of researchers Rosalind Franklin and Maurice Wilkins. Watson, Crick, and Wilkins jointly received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their work in 1962. Franklin was, controversially, excluded from the prize for...
Labeling DNA Probes03:31

Labeling DNA Probes

DNA probes are fragments of DNA labeled with a reporter tag to enable their detection or purification. The resulting labeled DNA probes can then hybridize to target nucleic acid sequences through complementary base-pairing, and may be used to recover or identify these regions.
Radioisotopes, fluorophores, or small molecule binding partners like biotin or digoxigenin, are the most widely used reporter tags for labeling DNA probes. These labels can be attached to the probe DNA molecule via...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical and pathological findings in two Italian siblings of Romani ancestry with charcot-marie-tooth type 4D and review of the current literature.

Journal of neuromuscular diseases·2026
Same author

Semi-automated forensic examination of handwritten character loops.

Forensic science international·2026
Same author

Functional validation of the novel KIF5A p.R17Q VUS reveals defective axonal transport in iPSC-motoneurons from a SPG10 patient.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
Same author

Neurotrophic Modulation Restores Motor and Developmental Defects in Zebrafish Models of ints11 Deficiency.

Journal of neurochemistry·2026
Same author

A Bayesian decision approach to classify crime scene observations in sharp-force fatalities: a study on suicide vs. homicide scenarios.

International journal of legal medicine·2026
Same author

Gene-Pseudogene Inversions as a Hidden Source of Missing Heritability.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection
07:35

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection

Published on: June 8, 2020

Value of DNA tests: a decision perspective.

Franco Taroni1, Silvia Bozza, Magali Bernard

  • 1Institute of Forensic Science, School of Criminal Justice, BCH, University of Lausanne, Lausanne-Dorigny CH-1015, Switzerland. Franco.Taroni@unil.ch

Journal of Forensic Sciences
|January 11, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Forensic scientists can use decision analysis to determine the optimal number of DNA markers for criminal cases. More markers do not always increase the analytical value in DNA evidence, contrary to common belief.

More Related Videos

A Quantitative Assay to Study Protein:DNA Interactions, Discover Transcriptional Regulators of Gene Expression, and Identify Novel Anti-tumor Agents
06:43

A Quantitative Assay to Study Protein:DNA Interactions, Discover Transcriptional Regulators of Gene Expression, and Identify Novel Anti-tumor Agents

Published on: August 31, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection
07:35

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection

Published on: June 8, 2020

A Quantitative Assay to Study Protein:DNA Interactions, Discover Transcriptional Regulators of Gene Expression, and Identify Novel Anti-tumor Agents
06:43

A Quantitative Assay to Study Protein:DNA Interactions, Discover Transcriptional Regulators of Gene Expression, and Identify Novel Anti-tumor Agents

Published on: August 31, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Genetics
  • Decision Analysis

Background:

  • In DNA-evidence cases, legal professionals often question the limited number of genetic markers used by forensic scientists.
  • The common assumption is that increasing the number of typed markers (loci) invariably enhances DNA evidence strength.
  • This perspective challenges the conventional approach to marker selection in forensic DNA profiling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce decision analysis as a framework for optimizing the number of DNA markers in criminal investigations.
  • To evaluate the relationship between the number of typed markers and the analytical added value in forensic contexts.
  • To provide a rational basis for marker selection beyond the 'more is better' assumption.

Main Methods:

  • Application of decision analysis principles to the forensic scientist's marker selection process.
  • Modeling the decision-making process involving rational choice under uncertainty.
  • Simulation of results to test the hypothesis regarding analytical added value and marker number.

Main Results:

  • Simulated results indicate that analytical added value does not proportionally increase with a higher number of DNA markers.
  • The study supports the hypothesis that there is a point of diminishing returns for marker quantity.
  • Decision analysis provides a structured method to balance marker number with evidential value.

Conclusions:

  • The number of DNA markers to be typed in criminal cases should be determined using a decision-analytic approach.
  • Increasing the number of markers beyond a certain point does not necessarily enhance the analytical value of DNA evidence.
  • This study offers a more nuanced perspective on DNA marker selection in forensic science.