Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Tilt Testing with Combined Lower Body Negative Pressure: a "Gold Standard" for Measuring Orthostatic Tolerance
Published on: March 21, 2013
External validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule
Benjamin C Sun1, Carol M Mangione, Guy Merchant
1Department of Medicine, West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA. bsun@post.harvard.edu
The San Francisco Syncope Rule showed lower accuracy in identifying serious clinical events in syncope patients during external validation. This study highlights the need for careful consideration of its performance in diverse patient populations.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Clinical Decision Rules
- Cardiology
Background:
- The San Francisco Syncope Rule is a clinical decision tool designed to identify patients with syncope at risk for serious clinical events.
- External validation is crucial to assess the generalizability and reliability of clinical decision rules in new patient cohorts.
- Accurate risk stratification in syncope patients presenting to the emergency department is essential for appropriate management and resource allocation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To externally validate the diagnostic accuracy of the San Francisco Syncope Rule in identifying syncope patients who will experience a 7-day serious clinical event.
- To assess the rule's performance in predicting serious clinical events not initially identified in the emergency department evaluation.
Main Methods:
- Prospective enrollment of syncope or near-syncope patients in a single academic emergency department.
- Systematic recording of San Francisco Syncope Rule risk factors by treating physicians.
- Structured telephone interviews at 14 days and blinded physician panel review to ascertain serious clinical events.
Main Results:
- The San Francisco Syncope Rule demonstrated a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 42% for predicting any 7-day serious clinical event.
- For serious events not identified initially, sensitivity was 69% and specificity was 42%.
- These performance estimates were minimally impacted by missing follow-up data.
Conclusions:
- In this external validation cohort, the San Francisco Syncope Rule exhibited lower sensitivity and specificity compared to previous reports.
- The findings suggest a potential decline in the rule's effectiveness when applied to a new patient population.
Related Concept Videos
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System II: Inspection
Head and Neck
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...

