Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Modified Octopus Technique for Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Published on: August 1, 2025
Coverage of the left subclavian artery during thoracic endovascular aortic repair
Paul J Riesenman1, Mark A Farber, Robert R Mendes
1Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Insights
Intentional coverage of the left subclavian artery origin during thoracic endovascular aortic repair is generally safe. Most patients tolerate coverage without symptoms, allowing for effective treatment of proximal thoracic aortic lesions.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Thoracic Aortic Disease
Background:
- Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) requires adequate proximal and distal landing zones.
- Aortic arch branch vessels, like the left subclavian artery (LSA), can limit proximal landing zone options.
- This limitation often precludes endovascular repair for more proximal thoracic aortic lesions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and outcomes of intentional coverage of the LSA origin during TEVAR.
- To determine if expectant management of LSA coverage is a viable strategy.
- To assess the incidence of complications related to LSA coverage in TEVAR.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective review of 112 patients undergoing TEVAR between 2000 and 2005.
- Analysis of 28 patients (25%) with proximal stent graft coverage of at least one great vessel.
- Focus on 24 patients with zone 2 proximal landing sites involving LSA coverage, with or without prior revascularization.
Main Results:
- Among 24 zone 2 patients, 10 had partial LSA coverage; 19 experienced complete LSA flow cessation without revascularization.
- Only 3 patients (15.8%) developed non-intervention-warranting upper extremity symptoms; one (5.3%) had rest pain requiring LSA stenting.
- Two primary and one secondary endoleak were observed; three cerebrovascular accidents occurred. All supra-aortic debranching cases were successful.
Conclusions:
- Intentional coverage of the LSA origin for adequate proximal landing zones in TEVAR is well tolerated.
- Expectant management is a viable strategy for most patients with LSA coverage.
- Exceptions may require intervention, but TEVAR can be successfully performed for proximal thoracic lesions.
Background:
Thoracic aortic stent grafts require proximal and distal landing zones of adequate length to effectively exclude thoracic aortic lesions. The origins of the left subclavian artery and other aortic arch branch vessels often impose limitations on the proximal landing zone, thereby disallowing endovascular repair of more proximal thoracic lesions.
Methods:
Between October 2000 and November 2005, 112 patients received stent grafts to treat lesions involving the thoracic aorta. The proximal aspect of the stent graft partially or totally occluded the origin of at least one great vessel in 28 patients (25%). The proximal attachment site was in zone 0 in one patient (3.6%), zone 1 in three patients (10.7%), and zone 2 in 24 patients (85.7%). Patients with proximal implantation in zones 0 or 1 underwent debranching procedures of the supra-aortic vessels before stent graft repair. In one patient who underwent zone 1 deployment, the left subclavian artery was revascularized before stent graft deployment. Among patients who underwent zone 2 deployment with partial or complete occlusion of the left subclavian artery, none underwent prior revascularization. Patients were assessed postoperatively and at follow-up for development of neurologic symptoms as well as symptoms of left upper extremity claudication or ischemia.
Results:
Mean follow-up was 7.3 months. Among the 24 patients with zone 2 implantation, 10 (42%) had partial left subclavian artery coverage at the time of their primary procedure. A total of 19 patients experienced complete cessation of antegrade flow through the origin of the left subclavian artery without revascularization at the time of the initial endograft repair as a result of a secondary procedure or as a consequence of left subclavian artery thrombosis. Left upper extremity symptoms developed in three (15.8%) patients that did not warrant intervention, and rest pain developed in one (5.3%), which was treated with the deployment of a left subclavian artery stent. Two primary (type IA and type III) endoleaks (7.1%) and one secondary endoleak (type IA) (3.6%) were observed in patients who underwent zone 2 deployment. Three cerebrovascular accidents were observed. Thoracic aortic lesions were successfully excluded in all patients who underwent supra-aortic debranching procedures.
Conclusion:
Intentional coverage of the origin of the left subclavian artery to obtain an adequate proximal landing zone during endovascular repair of thoracic aortic lesions is well tolerated and may be managed expectantly, with some exceptions.
Related Concept Videos
The Arch of Aorta
Encircling the heart, the coronary arteries form a ring-like structure before...
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Thoracic Aorta
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care