Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

07:22
Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision
Published on: June 13, 2025
Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in gynecological surgery
Camran Nezhat1, Naghmeh S Saberi, Babac Shahmohamady
1Department of OB/GYN and Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California 94304, USA. nssaberi@quimbus.com
JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
|January 11, 2007
Summary
Robotic-assisted laparoscopy offers enhanced 3D visualization and precision in gynecologic surgery but involves higher costs and longer setup times. This technique bridges traditional laparoscopy and open surgery, providing valuable insights for minimally invasive procedures.
Area of Science:
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Surgical Technology
- Gynecologic Surgery
Background:
- Laparoscopic surgery has been a cornerstone of minimally invasive procedures for three decades.
- Robotic-assisted surgery represents a significant advancement in minimally invasive techniques.
- This technology has seen widespread adoption in urology, cardiac, and general surgery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To report preliminary experiences with robotic-assisted laparoscopy in gynecologic surgery.
- To evaluate the role and feasibility of robotic-assisted laparoscopy in various gynecologic procedures.
- To assess the advantages and disadvantages of this surgical approach.
Main Methods:
- A case series involving 15 patients undergoing gynecologic surgeries.
- Procedures included a combination of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic techniques using the da Vinci robot.
- Key metrics such as assembly/disassembly time were measured, alongside subjective evaluations.
Main Results:
- Fifteen patients underwent diverse procedures including myomectomies, hysterectomies, and endometriosis treatment.
- Average assembly time to switch to robotic assistance was 18.9 minutes; disassembly averaged 2.1 minutes.
- Robotic-assisted laparoscopy was found to be a viable bridge between laparoscopy and laparotomy, despite cost and bulk concerns.
Conclusions:
- Robotic-assisted laparoscopy enhances surgical precision through 3D visualization, reduced surgeon fatigue, and improved dexterity.
- Significant disadvantages include high costs, increased operating time for setup, and equipment bulkiness.
- The technology offers benefits but requires careful consideration of its limitations in gynecologic surgery.
