Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Optimal beam quality selection in digital mammography.

K C Young1, J M Oduko, H Bosmans

  • 1National Coordinating Centre for the Physics of Mammography, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford GU2 7XX, UK. ken.young@nhs.net

The British Journal of Radiology
|January 11, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enhanced recovery after fetal spina bifida surgery: global practice.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2024
Same author

Task-based selection of three-dimensional rotational angiography imaging modes using in-house phantom.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2024
Same author

Task-based detectability in anatomical background in digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic mammography.

Physics in medicine and biology·2024
Same author

Investigation of test methods for QC in dual-energy based contrast-enhanced digital mammography systems: II. Artefacts/uniformity, exposure time and phantom-based dosimetry.

Physics in medicine and biology·2023
Same author

Investigation of test methods for QC in dual-energy based contrast-enhanced digital mammography systems: I. Iodine signal testing.

Physics in medicine and biology·2023
Same author

Seven general radiography x-ray detectors with pixel sizes ranging from 175 to 76<i>μ</i>m: technical evaluation with the focus on orthopaedic imaging.

Physics in medicine and biology·2023

Optimizing digital mammography beam quality reduces mean glandular dose (MGD) while maintaining image quality. Higher energy X-rays are optimal for thicker breasts, requiring adjusted detector doses for best results.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Radiology
  • Diagnostic Imaging

Background:

  • Digital mammography systems require optimal beam quality for effective breast cancer screening.
  • Current systems may not consistently achieve the best balance between image quality and radiation dose.
  • Mean glandular dose (MGD) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) are key metrics for evaluating mammography performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To experimentally determine the optimal beam quality for digital mammography systems.
  • To compare the MGD and CNR across different breast thicknesses and beam qualities.
  • To provide recommendations for optimizing automatic exposure control (AEC) in mammography.

Main Methods:

  • Applied an experimental method to Fuji Profect and GE Senographe 2000D systems.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measured MGD and CNR using Perspex breast phantoms (20-90 mm thick).
  • Tested four combinations of tube voltage and target/filter for each phantom thickness.

    • Main Results:

    • Optimal beam quality varied by breast thickness: Mo/Mo for 21-32 mm, Rh/Rh for ≥45 mm.
    • Higher energy beams (Rh/Rh) reduced MGD by 32% for a 75 mm breast at equivalent CNR.
    • Achieving the same CNR with higher energy beams required a ~90% greater detector dose due to lower contrast.

    Conclusions:

    • Current AEC systems aiming for fixed detector dose are suboptimal.
    • Higher energy spectra should be used for average and larger breasts, accompanied by increased detector doses.
    • This optimization can lead to slightly higher doses but significantly improved image quality.