Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Toxicity Testing in Animals01:23

Toxicity Testing in Animals

Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...
Toxicokinetics: Overview01:21

Toxicokinetics: Overview

Studies that assess how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted (ADME) at toxic doses are termed toxicokinetics. Understanding toxicokinetics helps predict adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and manage toxicity in humans.Toxicokinetics differs from pharmacokinetics mainly in the dose levels studied, with toxicokinetics focusing on higher toxic doses. The kinetics at these levels can be non-linear due to altered physiological processes. Toxicodynamics examines the relationship...
Drug Toxicity: Dose-Dependent Reactions01:24

Drug Toxicity: Dose-Dependent Reactions

Drug toxicities can be stratified into pharmacological, pathological, or genotoxic based on their mechanisms. The incidence and severity of these toxicities generally increase with the drug's concentration in the body and exposure time.Pharmacological toxicity is evident when the therapeutic effects of drugs overshoot into adverse reactions in a predictable, dose-dependent manner. Central nervous system (CNS) depression from barbiturates is a classic example, with effects escalating from...
Toxic Reactions: Overview01:26

Toxic Reactions: Overview

When toxic substances penetrate the human body, they disseminate to various tissues, undergoing metabolic changes. This process yields reactive metabolites that may covalently bind with specific target molecules, resulting in toxicity.
Toxicity falls into two primary categories: local and systemic.
Local toxicity appears at the exposure site, such as protein denaturation caused by caustic substances.
In contrast, systemic toxicity requires the toxic agent's absorption and distribution,...
Drug Toxicity: Overview01:00

Drug Toxicity: Overview

Drug toxicity quantifies the harm a compound causes to an organism, varying by dose and potentially impacting whole systems or specific organs like the liver. Toxic reactions may arise from venomous insect or spider bites, with effects ranging from mild symptoms to severe outcomes such as brain damage or death. Common forms of acute poisoning include ethanol intoxication and overdose of pain or fever medications, with substances like GHB and heroin being particularly lethal at doses close to...
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity01:25

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Differentiated concept for treatment of incisional hernias].

Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)·2026
Same author

The Impact of a Community Health Worker-Led Lifestyle-Social Determinants Program on Pacific Islander Cardiometabolic Health.

American journal of preventive medicine·2026
Same author

Correction: An anatomical study of the subarachnoid space surrounding the trigeminal ganglion in horses-in preparation for a controlled glycerol rhizotomy in equids.

Frontiers in veterinary science·2025
Same author

Corrigendum to "Hypothesis-driven approach to developmental toxicity assessment: Using mechanistic information to inform testing" [Reprod. Toxicol. 140 (2026) 109119].

Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Hypothesis-driven approach to developmental toxicity assessment: Using mechanistic information to inform testing.

Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

DeBakey Forceps: The Quintessential Tool for Perforator Surgery?

Microsurgery·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Evaluating Toxicity of Chemicals using a Zebrafish Vibration Startle Response Screening System
06:25

Evaluating Toxicity of Chemicals using a Zebrafish Vibration Startle Response Screening System

Published on: January 12, 2024

Framework for use of toxicity screening tools in context-based decision-making.

John Doull1, Joseph F Borzelleca, Richard Becker

  • 1University of Kansas, United States.

Food and Chemical Toxicology : an International Journal Published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association
|January 12, 2007
PubMed
Summary

This study presents a framework for using screening tools in human health risk assessment when complete data is unavailable. It outlines a structured approach to decision-making, managing uncertainty, and selecting appropriate tools for toxicology evaluations.

More Related Videos

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents (HPHC)
11:38

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents (HPHC)

Published on: May 10, 2016

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation
16:02

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation

Published on: February 10, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Evaluating Toxicity of Chemicals using a Zebrafish Vibration Startle Response Screening System
06:25

Evaluating Toxicity of Chemicals using a Zebrafish Vibration Startle Response Screening System

Published on: January 12, 2024

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents (HPHC)
11:38

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents (HPHC)

Published on: May 10, 2016

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation
16:02

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation

Published on: February 10, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology and Risk Assessment
  • Environmental Health Sciences

Background:

  • Risk assessment relies on comprehensive toxicology data, which is often incomplete.
  • Decisions regarding human health protection must still be made despite data gaps.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe a framework for applying screening tools in human health decision-making.
  • To provide guidance on selecting and utilizing screening tools effectively in risk assessment.
  • To adapt the framework for potential use in environmental risk assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a framework involving problem formulation, screening strategy, and data analysis.
  • Incorporation of weight-of-evidence criteria and uncertainty analysis.
  • Identification of criteria for selecting appropriate screening tools based on context and uncertainty.

Main Results:

  • A structured, iterative framework for applying screening tools in risk assessment.
  • Defined criteria for choosing screening tools based on specific questions and acceptable uncertainty levels.
  • Demonstrated applicability through case studies for various toxicity endpoints.

Conclusions:

  • Screening tools can support risk assessment and management decisions, provided their limitations are understood.
  • The proposed framework facilitates informed decision-making by integrating data analysis, uncertainty management, and tool selection.
  • The framework is adaptable and can be iteratively refined for effective application in diverse toxicological contexts.