An association study of DRD2 and COMT polymorphisms with novelty seeking and harm avoidance scores, in two

Katrina J Light1, Peter R Joyce, Suzanne E Luty

  • 1Department of Psychological Medicine, Christchurch School of Medicine & Health Sciences, PO Box 4345, Christchurch, New Zealand. katrina.light@otago.ac.nz

Abstract

Insights

This study found no link between dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) genes and personality traits in depressed patients. The findings suggest the COMT-DRD2 model may not apply to individuals with depression.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Genetics
  • Psychiatry

Background:

  • Previous research suggested dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene interaction influences behavioral approach systems.
  • Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) novelty seeking (NS) and harm avoidance (HA) scales correlate with behavioral inhibition and approach systems.
  • The COMT-DRD2 Equilibrium Model of Positive Emotionality was proposed based on these correlations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the association between DRD2 and COMT genes and behavioral activation in depressed outpatients.
  • To examine if the COMT-DRD2 Equilibrium Model is applicable to individuals diagnosed with depression.
  • To analyze personality traits using the TCI in relation to specific gene loci.

Main Methods:

  • Two independent samples of depressed outpatients (N=146) were analyzed.
  • Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-squared tests were used to examine gene loci associations with NS and HA scores.
  • Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) assessed the influence of age and gender on personality scores and gene associations.

Main Results:

  • No significant association was found between DRD2 or COMT genes, individually or interactively, and NS or HA scores in either sample.
  • Age was significantly negatively associated with NS scores.
  • Including age in interaction analyses did not alter the significance of personality-gene associations.

Conclusions:

  • The COMT-DRD2 Equilibrium Model of Positive Emotionality is not supported in currently depressed individuals.
  • The genetic underpinnings of behavioral approach and inhibition may differ in clinical depression compared to healthy populations.
  • Further research is needed to understand the genetic and neurobiological factors influencing personality in depression.