Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
Published on: July 4, 2016
Geometry dependence of spin-spin couplings in cyanamide by DFT analysis
Tanja van Mourik1, Andrew J Dingley
1Chemistry Department, University College London, 20 Gordon Street, London WC1H 0AJ, UK. tanja.vanmourik@st-andrews.ac.uk
Abstract:
There have been numerous theoretical and experimental investigations examining NMR parameters related to non-amino N-H...N H-bonded moieties in both biological and chemical contexts. In contrast, little information on the geometry dependence of NMR parameters related to the biologically important H-bond donor amino group is available. Herein, the geometric dependencies of the one-bond amino N-H spin-spin coupling constants [(1)J(NH)] in the cyanamide monomer and dimer have been computed with B3LYP and the aug-cc-pVTZ-su0 basis set. In an isolated planar cyanamide molecule, the |(1)J(NH)| couplings were found to increase as the N-H bond lengthened. In contrast, in the planar cyanamide dimer the size of the H-bonded amino N-H coupling (|(1)J(N(d)H(d))|) decreased with increasing N(d)H(d) bond length. The |(1)J(N(d)H(d))| coupling was larger than the |(1)J(N(d)H(free))| coupling for N(d)H(d) distances up to 1.18 A (for a fixed N(d)H(free) distance of 1.006 A). Hence, the decrease of |(1)J(NH)| with increasing N-H distance, as well as the larger value of |(1)J(N(d)H(d))| compared to |(1)J(N(d)H(free))|, were only observed for situations where the amino group is involved in an H-bonding interaction. This is attributed to electron redistribution induced by the presence of the second cyanamide molecule. Similar electron-redistribution effects are thought to be responsible for the observed distance dependence of computed (1)J(NH) couplings of H-bonded amino groups in near-planar G-quartet structures. Here, the |(1)J(NH)| couplings of the amino N-H bonds decreased with increasing N-H bond length whereas the |(1)J(N(d)H(d))| couplings are approximately 7 Hz larger than the |(1)J(N(d)H(free))| couplings, despite the longer N(d)-H(d) bond length.
More Related Videos
08:54Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid
Published on: January 25, 2020
05:57Synthesizing Amino Acids Modified with Reactive Carbonyls in Silico to Assess Structural Effects Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Published on: April 26, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Valence Bond Theory
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling