Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Long-term survival of patients with heart failure and ventricular conduction delay treated with cardiac
Angelo Auricchio1, Marco Metra, Maurizio Gasparini
1Division of Cardiology, University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany. angelo.auricchio@cardiocentro.org
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) offers favorable long-term outcomes for heart failure patients with wide QRS duration. Adding an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) backup significantly protects against sudden cardiac death, though heart failure remains a leading cause of mortality.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Long-term outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in daily practice are not well-established.
- The comparative survival benefits of CRT versus randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and their long-term sustainability remain unclear.
- Optimal pharmacologic therapy is standard for heart failure (HF) patients with prolonged QRS duration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the long-term outcomes of heart failure patients treated with CRT alone or with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) backup.
- To assess the reproducibility of CRT benefits in a real-world, multicenter setting.
- To evaluate the impact of ICD backup on mortality, particularly sudden cardiac death.
Main Methods:
- Longitudinal observational trial involving 1,303 consecutive patients with ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy.
- Patients received CRT alone (44%) or CRT with ICD backup for symptomatic HF and prolonged QRS duration.
- Primary endpoint: cumulative event-free survival (death, urgent transplantation, LVAD implantation); secondary: HF deaths, sudden cardiac death, noncardiac death.
Main Results:
- One-year and five-year cumulative event-free survival rates were 92% and 56%, respectively.
- CRT with ICD backup showed a nonsignificant 20% reduction in overall mortality but a highly significant protective effect against sudden cardiac death (HR 0.04, p <0.002).
- Heart failure deaths constituted the leading cause of mortality (25.1%), competing with other causes.
Conclusions:
- Routine CRT treatment in advanced heart failure patients with wide QRS complexes yields favorable and reproducible long-term outcomes across centers.
- While HF remains the primary cause of death, ICD backup significantly mitigates the risk of sudden cardiac death.
- The combination of CRT and ICD backup demonstrates a trend towards reduced total mortality.
Abstract:
This multicenter longitudinal observational trial was designed to analyze the long-term outcome of patients with heart failure (HF) treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) alone or with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) backup in a daily practice scenario. It is unknown whether the magnitude of survival benefits conferred by CRT in a daily practice scenario is comparable to what has been observed in randomized controlled trials and whether this benefit is sustained over the long term. The outcome of 1,303 consecutive patients with ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy on optimal pharmacologic therapy treated from August 1, 1995 to August 1, 2004 at 4 European centers with CRT alone (44%) or with ICD backup for symptomatic HF and prolonged QRS duration was assessed. Cumulative event-free survival was evaluated for a combined end point, defined as death from any cause, urgent transplantation, or implantation of a left ventricular assist device. The cumulative incidence of competing events, HF, sudden cardiac death, and noncardiac death, was also assessed. Event-free survival was similar across the different centers. At 1 and 5 years, cumulative event-free survivals were 92% (95% confidence interval [CI] 91 to 94) and 56% (95% CI 48 to 64), respectively. The cumulative incidence of HF deaths was 25.1% (95% CI 19 to 31.7), whereas that of sudden death was 9.5% (95% CI 5.1 to 15.7). Using multivariate analysis, CRT with an ICD backup was associated with a nonsignificant decrease in mortality by 20% (hazard ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.17, p = 0.284), with a highly significant protective effect against sudden cardiac death (hazard ratio 0.04, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.28, p <0.002). In conclusion, patients with advanced HF and a wide QRS complex routinely treated with CRT have a favorable long-term outcome that was reproducible at different centers. The leading cause of death in these patients remained HF, and this mode of death was competing with other causes in determining outcome. Total mortality was 20% lower with ICD backup (95% CI 42% lower to 17% higher) due to a protective effect against sudden cardiac death.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

