Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Relation of left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy to left ventricular reverse
Aleksandr Rovner1, Lisa de las Fuentes, Mitchell N Faddis
1Cardiovascular Imaging and Clinical Research Core Laboratory, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Insights
Optimal cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) involves lateral left ventricular (LV) lead placement. This position improves LV remodeling and diastolic dyssynchrony more effectively than other locations.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Cardiac Electrophysiology
Background:
- Left ventricular (LV) lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) impacts cardiac remodeling and dyssynchrony.
- Optimal LV lead positioning for CRT is not well-defined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effects of different LV lead placements on LV remodeling and dyssynchrony after CRT.
- To compare the echocardiographic outcomes based on LV lead location (lateral, posterolateral, anterolateral).
Main Methods:
- Echocardiography and Tissue Doppler imaging were used to assess LV volumes, ejection fraction, and systolic/diastolic dyssynchrony.
- Sixty-one patients undergoing CRT were analyzed before and after the procedure.
- Analysis of variance determined the impact of lead placement on echocardiographic variables.
Main Results:
- Lateral LV lead placement was associated with significantly smaller LV volumes compared to posterolateral placement (p <0.01).
- Improved diastolic dyssynchrony was observed with lateral lead placement versus anterior placement (p <0.05).
- No significant differences in LV ejection fraction or systolic dyssynchrony improvement were found among groups.
Conclusions:
- Lateral LV lead placement in CRT patients promotes greater reverse LV remodeling.
- Lateral lead placement significantly improves diastolic dyssynchrony compared to other locations.
Abstract:
The effects of left ventricular (LV) lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on LV remodeling and dyssynchrony are not well defined. Sixty-one patients (age 60 +/- 11 years, 76% men) were evaluated by echocardiography before and 4 +/- 2 months after CRT and grouped by the LV lead placement (lateral, posterolateral, or anterolateral). Echocardiographic measurements included LV volumes and LV ejection fraction. Tissue Doppler imaging was used to assess for inter- and intraventricular systolic and diastolic dyssynchrony. Analysis of variance was used to determine the effect of the LV lead placement on echocardiographic variables after CRT. The LV lead was placed in a lateral cardiac vein in 33 patients (54%), posterolateral in 15 (25%), and anterior in 13 (21%). Lateral LV lead placement was associated with significantly smaller LV volumes compared with the posterolateral lead placement (p <0.01). Diastolic dyssynchrony improved significantly with lateral lead placement compared with the anterior lead location (p <0.05). Improvement in LV ejection fraction and inter- and intraventricular systolic dyssynchrony was similar among the 3 groups. In conclusion, in patients undergoing CRT, a lateral lead location resulted in greater reverse LV remodeling and improved diastolic dyssynchrony compared with other lead placement locations.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy

