Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reconstructing dynamic regulatory maps.

Jason Ernst1, Oded Vainas, Christopher T Harbison

  • 1Machine Learning Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

Molecular Systems Biology
|January 17, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

SenSet defines cell-type specific senescence signatures in the aged human lung.

The EMBO journal·2026
Same author

MolQuery: Prediction of Lipid Synthesizability Using Active Learning.

ACS omega·2026
Same author

MissenseHMM: state-based annotations for missense variants through joint modeling of pathogenicity scores.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

A Single-Cell and Spatial 3D Multi-omic Atlas of Developing Human Basal Ganglia and Inhibitory Neurons.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Deep Batch Active Learning for Protein Structure Modeling.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2026
Same author

Evaluation of statistical differential analysis methods for identification of senescent cells using single-cell transcriptomics.

Cell reports methods·2026
Same journal

E. coli prepares for starvation by dramatically remodeling its proteome in the first hours after loss of nutrients.

Molecular systems biology·2026
Same journal

Common xenobiotics modulate gut microbial responses to low‑calorie sweeteners in vitro.

Molecular systems biology·2026
Same journal

ParTIpy: a scalable framework for archetypal analysis and Pareto task inference.

Molecular systems biology·2026
Same journal

Quantitative interactome mapping of skeletal muscle insulin resistance.

Molecular systems biology·2026
Same journal

Interpretable multi-omics integration across mixed-order tensors with MANTRA.

Molecular systems biology·2026
Same journal

To cleave or not to cleave: a systemic evaluation of DSS versus DSSO for cross-linking mass spectrometry analysis.

Molecular systems biology·2026
See all related articles

Researchers developed a new computational method to map gene regulatory networks. This approach models dynamic protein-DNA interactions and identifies key transcription factors controlling cellular responses to stress.

Area of Science:

  • Systems Biology
  • Computational Biology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Cellular responses to stimuli rely on dynamic protein-DNA interactions for gene regulation.
  • Understanding these complex regulatory networks is crucial for deciphering biological processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel computational method for modeling dynamic gene regulatory networks.
  • To create a unified temporal map of gene expression transitions and identify regulatory factors.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized an input-output hidden Markov model to capture the dynamic nature of regulatory networks.
  • Identified bifurcation points in gene expression time series where subsets of genes diverge.
  • Annotated bifurcation points with transcription factors to construct temporal regulatory maps.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Successfully applied the method to model yeast response to stress, recovering known aspects of the response.
  • Experimentally validated predictions, uncovering new roles for Ino4 and Gcn4 in stress response.
  • Revealed a temporal cascade of factors, common pathways, and differences between master and secondary regulatory factors.

Conclusions:

  • The developed computational method provides a powerful tool for analyzing dynamic gene regulatory networks.
  • The study elucidated key transcription factors and regulatory mechanisms involved in yeast stress response.
  • This approach offers insights into network motif utilization and condition-specific gene regulation.