Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS

Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS

Genome-wide association studies or GWAS are used to identify whether common SNPs are associated with certain diseases. Suppose specific SNPs are more frequently observed in individuals with a particular disease than those without the disease. In that case, those SNPs are said to be associated with the disease. Chi-square analysis is performed to check the probability of the allele likely to be associated with the disease.
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...

Bonferroni Test

Bonferroni Test

The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Test of CP Symmetry in the Neutral Decays of Λ via J/ψ→ΛΛ[over ¯].

Physical review letters·2026

Same author

Precise Measurement of the Chromoelectric Dipole Moment of the Charm Quark.

Physical review letters·2026

Same author

Precise Measurement of Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry with Entangled Hyperon-Antihyperon Pairs.

Physical review letters·2026

Same author

[Conversion efficacy and safety analysis of PD-1 inhibitor combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel and SOX chemotherapy regimen in initially unresectable advanced gastric cancer].

Zhonghua wei chang wai ke za zhi = Chinese journal of gastrointestinal surgery·2026

Same author

Observation of Λ[over ¯]p→K^{+}π^{+}π^{-}π^{0} and Λ[over ¯]p→K^{+}π^{+}π^{-}2π^{0}.

Physical review letters·2026

Same author

First Measurement of the D_{s}^{+}→K^{0}μ^{+}ν_{μ} Decay.

Physical review letters·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Two-sample comparison based on prediction error, with applications to candidate gene association studies.

K Yu¹, R Martin, N Rothman

¹Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. yuka@mail.nih.gov

Annals of Human Genetics

|January 18, 2007

Summary

This study introduces a novel machine learning association test for complex diseases using classification trees. The new method, robust to population stratification, shows higher power than existing tests for genetic association studies.

More Related Videos

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

Area of Science:

Genetics
Computational Biology
Machine Learning

Background:

High-density SNP maps enable advanced genetic association studies.
Existing methods compare multilocus genotypes or haplotypes between cases and controls.

Purpose of the Study:

Propose a new supervised machine learning-based association test.
Utilize classification trees and prediction error for association testing.
Generate a prediction rule for understanding complex disease mechanisms.

Main Methods:

Viewed the two-sample testing problem from a supervised machine learning perspective.
Adopted classification tree models and used estimated prediction error as the test statistic.
Evaluated performance using simulation studies under a haplotype-based transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT) framework.

Main Results:

The proposed procedure demonstrated correct type I error rates and robustness to population stratification.
The .632+ prediction error estimator yielded the best overall performance.
The new test was more powerful than single-point TDT, Pearson's goodness-of-fit, and FBAT haplotype-based tests.

Conclusions:

The proposed machine learning approach offers a powerful new tool for genetic association studies.
The method is robust, provides correct error rates, and can identify complex disease associations.
Applied the method to study non-Hodgkin lymphoma and the IL10 gene, demonstrating practical utility.