Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.Although predation is commonly associated with carnivory, for...
Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
Echo01:06

Echo

The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case, then the...
Communication01:03

Communication

Communication between two animals occurs when one animal transmits an information signal that causes a change in the animal that receives the information. Organisms communicate with one another in a host of different ways. Signals can be auditory, chemical, visual, tactile, or a combination of these. Communication is a critical behavioral adaptation that promotes survival, growth, and reproduction.
Epiphytes, Parasites, and Carnivores02:40

Epiphytes, Parasites, and Carnivores

Plants often form mutualistic relationships with soil-dwelling fungi or bacteria to enhance their roots’ nutrient uptake ability. Root-colonizing fungi (e.g., mycorrhizae) increase a plant’s root surface area, which promotes nutrient absorption. While root-colonizing, nitrogen-fixing bacteria (e.g., rhizobia) convert atmospheric nitrogen (N2) into ammonia (NH3), making nitrogen available to plants for various biological functions. For example, nitrogen is essential for the biosynthesis of the...
What are Populations and Communities?00:30

What are Populations and Communities?

Populations are groups of individuals of the same species that inhabit a shared environment. Communities include multiple co-existing, interacting populations of different species. Metapopulations span multiple populations of the same species that occupy different areas. Metapopulations interact through immigration and emigration, providing genetic diversity that lends resilience to harsh environments. Population size and density can be estimated using quadrat and mark and recapture...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hypertension in autoimmune rheumatic diseases: progress made, gaps remain.

Journal of hypertension·2026
Same author

Female Dahl, but Not SS13<sup>BN</sup>, Rats Are Susceptible to High-Fat Diet-Induced Hypertension.

Research square·2026
Same author

Aerial hawking in a gleaning specialist bat (Trachops cirrhosus) does not involve a high-resolution buzz.

The Journal of experimental biology·2026
Same author

Inhibition of NLRP3 Differentially Regulates Blood Pressure and Inflammation in Male versus Female DOCA-Salt Sprague Dawley Rats.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Humans share acoustic preferences with other animals.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Differential Gene Expression in Differentiated Human Neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y Cells in Response to a Cocktail of Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Recording Behavioral Responses to Reflection in Crayfish
11:30

Recording Behavioral Responses to Reflection in Crayfish

Published on: May 14, 2010

Cues for eavesdroppers: do frog calls indicate prey density and quality?

Ximena E Bernal1, Rachel A Page, A Stanley Rand

  • 1Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712, USA. xbernal@mail.utexas.edu

The American Naturalist
|January 19, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Predators prefer complex mating calls from tungara frogs, but this preference isn't linked to individual frog quality. Instead, complex calls signal higher prey density, potentially aiding predator hunting success.

More Related Videos

Two Types of Assays for Detecting Frog Sperm Chemoattraction
10:02

Two Types of Assays for Detecting Frog Sperm Chemoattraction

Published on: December 27, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Recording Behavioral Responses to Reflection in Crayfish
11:30

Recording Behavioral Responses to Reflection in Crayfish

Published on: May 14, 2010

Two Types of Assays for Detecting Frog Sperm Chemoattraction
10:02

Two Types of Assays for Detecting Frog Sperm Chemoattraction

Published on: December 27, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Animal Behavior
  • Bioacoustics

Background:

  • Predators and parasites often exploit prey mating signals.
  • Eavesdropping on signals can lead to preferential predation based on specific cues.
  • The mechanisms behind signal preference in eavesdropping are not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate why eavesdropping predators prefer complex mating calls in the tungara frog (Physalaemus pustulosus).
  • To test hypotheses that complex calls indicate better prey quality or higher prey density.
  • To analyze natural variation in tungara frog mating calls in wild choruses.

Main Methods:

  • Assessed natural variation in tungara frog mating calls in wild choruses.
  • Correlated call complexity with individual frog metrics (length, mass, body condition).
  • Tested hypotheses linking call complexity to prey quality and prey density.

Main Results:

  • Tungara frog call complexity was not correlated with individual frog size or body condition.
  • Call complexity was positively correlated with higher prey/host abundance (density).
  • Conspecific females, bats, and flies all show a preference for complex calls.

Conclusions:

  • The preference for complex mating calls by eavesdropping predators is likely driven by prey density, not individual prey quality.
  • Higher prey density indicated by complex calls may increase predator hunting efficiency.
  • This finding sheds light on the evolutionary pressures shaping signal evolution and predator-prey interactions.