Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

DNA Microarrays02:34

DNA Microarrays

Microarrays are high-throughput and relatively inexpensive assays that can be automated to analyze large quantities of data at a time. They are used in genome-wide studies to compare gene or protein expression under two varied conditions, such as healthy and diseased states. Microarrays consist of glass or silica slides on which probe molecules are covalently attached through surface functionalization. Most commonly, the slides are prepared through the chemisorption of silanes to silica...
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Using latent class analysis to identify subgroups of postoperative older adults.

SAGE open medicine·2026
Same author

Garment-related patient-reported outcomes: a longitudinal pre-post comparison of autologous versus implant-based breast reconstruction.

European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society·2026
Same author

Changes in Symptom Scales of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Following Obstructive Sleep Apnea Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation·2026
Same author

Polymeric Sustained-Release Chlorhexidine Coating on Gutta-Percha Points for Prolonged Intracanal Antimicrobial Delivery: An In Vitro Study.

Pharmaceutics·2026
Same author

Implementation of a Systematic Patient Mobility Program Across 5 Hospitals.

Journal of the American Medical Directors Association·2026
Same author

Sustained Release Varnish of Chlorhexidine for Prevention of Biofilm Formation on Non-Absorbable Nasal and Ear Sponges.

Pharmaceutics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2
10:10

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Published on: September 18, 2021

Empirical comparison of tests for differential expression on simulated time series microarray experiments.

Ernest A Fischer1, Michael Friedman, Mia K Markey

  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering,The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium Proceedings. AMIA Symposium
|January 24, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Differential gene expression analysis methods vary in performance based on data normalization and background correction techniques. For accurate results, use specific statistical tests like ANOVA variants or Empirical Bayes Wilcoxon Rank Sum test depending on data preprocessing.

More Related Videos

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress
05:22

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Published on: July 29, 2022

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2
10:10

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Published on: September 18, 2021

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress
05:22

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Published on: July 29, 2022

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Gene Expression Analysis

Background:

  • Accurate identification of differentially expressed genes is crucial for understanding biological processes.
  • Time series microarray data presents unique challenges for differential expression analysis.
  • The performance of analysis methods can be significantly influenced by data preprocessing steps.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of various differential expression identification methods.
  • To evaluate the impact of normalization and background correction on analysis results.
  • To provide recommendations for optimal methods based on data preprocessing strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of multiple statistical methods for identifying differential expression.
  • Utilized time series microarray data from artificial gene networks.
  • Investigated the effects of background correction and normalization techniques (Loess, median centering).

Main Results:

  • Differential expression identification is highly dependent on normalization and background correction.
  • Loess normalization after background correction improved performance for most tested methods.
  • Median centering enhanced performance on data without background correction.

Conclusions:

  • Cui and Churchill's ANOVA variants are recommended for background-subtracted time series microarray data.
  • Efron and Tibshirani's Empirical Bayes Wilcoxon Rank Sum test is recommended when background cannot be removed.
  • Appropriate data preprocessing is essential for reliable differential gene expression analysis.