Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Task structure and postcompletion error in the execution of a routine procedure.

Michael D Byrne1, Elizabeth M Davis

  • 1Department of Psychology, Rice University, 6100 Main St., MS-25, Houston, TX 77005, USA. byrne@acm.org

Human Factors
|January 24, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quantitative analysis of fibroblast migration reveals migratory states characterized by force generation, cell shape and motion.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Post-power law of practice: Comparing static and dynamical models of skill acquisition.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Keeping It Smooth: The Role of Haptic Feedback in Shaping Motor Performance.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2026
Same author

Assessing ChatGPT's Responses to Otolaryngology Patient Questions.

The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2024
Same author

The environmental basis of memory.

Psychological review·2022
Same author

Evaluation of Robotic-Assisted Carotid Artery Stenting in a Virtual Model Using Motion-Based Performance Metrics.

Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists·2022
Same journal

Effects of Task Priority and Difficulty in Multitasking Across Screens.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Compatibility Effects With Simple Lever Tools: A Replication and Extension Beyond Simple Button Responses.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Effects of Egocentric and Exocentric Supervisor Viewpoint Perspectives on Motion Plan Legibility and Decision Support in Automated Spacecraft Docking Maneuvers.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

System-Wide Trust (SWT) Versus Component-Specific Trust (CST) in Multi-Agent Human-Agent Teams: Individual Variability in Trust Bias.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Driver Adaptation to Partially Automated Driving in Urban Environments: Effects of Repeated Exposure and System Capabilities on Drivers' Trust, Monitoring, and Response.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Modeling Human Expertise in a Sanding Task.

Human factors·2026
See all related articles

This study investigated postcompletion errors, finding that altering feedback timing significantly reduces errors without impacting performance speed. This design improvement is more effective than motivational interventions or retraining.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Human Factors Engineering

Background:

  • Routine procedural errors, such as postcompletion errors, occur frequently but are understudied.
  • Postcompletion errors are lapses in performance after a task's primary goal is achieved.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To replicate a laboratory paradigm for slip-class errors.
  • To identify underlying cognitive causes of postcompletion errors.
  • To evaluate design interventions for error reduction.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments involved training participants on a routine procedural task.
  • Performance was measured in later sessions, with Experiment 2 comparing design changes, motivational interventions, and retraining.
  • Feedback timing and task redesign were key variables manipulated.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A simple design change, altering feedback timing, substantially reduced error rates in Experiment 1.
  • This design improvement led to no decrease in overall performance speed.
  • Experiment 2 confirmed the superiority of the improved design over motivational strategies and retraining, with no speed-accuracy tradeoff.

Conclusions:

  • Controlled laboratory studies of slip-class errors are valuable for understanding cognitive factors.
  • Goal structure is a critical cognitive factor influencing procedural errors.
  • Findings have applications in interface design and error mitigation strategies.